Re: OFF TOPIC - Bail money for IETF 64?
"JFC (Jefsey) Morfin" <jefsey@jefsey.com> Sun, 18 September 2005 20:58 UTC
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EH6Ep-0006bp-DK; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 16:58:15 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EH6El-0006bh-0L for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 16:58:11 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA24880 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 16:58:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from montage.altserver.com ([63.247.74.122]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EH6KD-000278-Ex for ietf@ietf.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 17:03:51 -0400
Received: from ver78-2-82-241-91-24.fbx.proxad.net ([82.241.91.24] helo=jfc.afrac.org) by montage.altserver.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.44) id 1EH6EX-0000EG-Cg for ietf@ietf.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 13:57:57 -0700
Message-Id: <6.2.3.4.2.20050918222253.048c7d10@mail.jefsey.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.3.4
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 22:57:50 +0200
To: ietf@ietf.org
From: "JFC (Jefsey) Morfin" <jefsey@jefsey.com>
In-Reply-To: <432DB2BE.3040708@designwest.com>
References: <200509181807.OAA06587@ietf.org> <432DB2BE.3040708@designwest.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format="flowed"
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - montage.altserver.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - jefsey.com
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 02ec665d00de228c50c93ed6b5e4fc1a
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by ietf.org id QAA24880
Subject: Re: OFF TOPIC - Bail money for IETF 64?
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
At 20:32 18/09/2005, Lee Mahan wrote: >There are a number of states in the US with the same sort of >law....last I remembered Texas is one<grin> France law is very tought on this, as legal rights and duties are attached to the title. I suppose most survived IETF63? The only result in here of MCSE and of similar titles is that people smile at these "Engineers", as if they were self proclaimed. This is not fair for the work they did - even if some think the matter they worked on is no worth. More than anything else it is a terminology issue. "Engineer/Ingenieurs" are faux-amis. - in French "Ingénieur" comes from "ingenium" wich convey the idea to invent. An applied searcher, designer. - in English "Engineer" conveys the idea of running an engine/machine, or being trained for that. We would say "un machiniste" but the term is not much used. The correct term would be "technicien" (which is also a regulated term in academic diplomas). Would Microsoft deliver McsD titles (what is more in line with what are our "Engineers")? IETF as such is not a society of Engineers, but a task force for an Internet Engineering, what can be carried by anyone. jfc >Nicholas Staff wrote: > >>It would seem we will all be in violation of Canadian law (as will the IETF >>as an organization) when we convene for IETF 64. Those canucks apparently >>regulate the term "Engineer" and the use of Software, Network, or Systems >>Engineer is um apparently not allowed. I wonder if they'll put Dave Crocker >>and Dean Anderson in the same cell... ;) >> >>Here's a link to the Microsoft court loss for the use of Engineer in their >>MCSE certification >> >>http://www.peo.on.ca/enforcement/Quebec_MS_April2004.pdf >> >>Please don't take this too seriously and call me an idiot, this is of course >>said with a chuckle. >> >>Nick >> >> >>_______________________________________________ >>Ietf mailing list >>Ietf@ietf.org >>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf >> > >_______________________________________________ >Ietf mailing list >Ietf@ietf.org >https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
- OFF TOPIC - Bail money for IETF 64? Nicholas Staff
- RE: OFF TOPIC - Bail money for IETF 64? sbrim
- Re: OFF TOPIC - Bail money for IETF 64? Lee Mahan
- Re: OFF TOPIC - Bail money for IETF 64? Stephen Sprunk
- RE: OFF TOPIC - Bail money for IETF 64? Jasen Strutt
- RE: OFF TOPIC - Bail money for IETF 64? Nicholas Staff
- Re: OFF TOPIC - Bail money for IETF 64? JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- Re: Re: OFF TOPIC - Bail money for IETF 64? John Loughney
- RE: Re: OFF TOPIC - Bail money for IETF 64? Nicholas Staff
- RE: OFF TOPIC - Bail money for IETF 64? Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: OFF TOPIC - Bail money for IETF 64? Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: OFF TOPIC - Bail money for IETF 64? George Swallow
- Re: OFF TOPIC - Bail money for IETF 64? Adrian Farrel
- RE: OFF TOPIC - Bail money for IETF 64? Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: OFF TOPIC - Bail money for IETF 64? JFC (Jefsey) Morfin