Re: Comments on <draft-cooper-privacy-policy-01.txt>

"Hannes Tschofenig" <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net> Fri, 09 July 2010 12:16 UTC

Return-Path: <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 459813A6A3F for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Jul 2010 05:16:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.052
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.052 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.547, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CtO3F-0iKjQ7 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Jul 2010 05:15:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 8E6153A6A3E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Jul 2010 05:15:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 31770 invoked by uid 0); 9 Jul 2010 12:15:53 -0000
Received: from 212.95.22.202 by www040.gmx.net with HTTP; Fri, 09 Jul 2010 14:15:50 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2010 14:15:50 +0200
From: Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net>
In-Reply-To: <m2tyo8hneu.wl%randy@psg.com>
Message-ID: <20100709121550.123890@gmx.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <7022DEA1-7FC0-4D77-88CE-FA3788720B43@cdt.org> <47076F01-CC4C-45E6-803E-8E2516BE15AC@gmail.com> <20100709113224.123900@gmx.net> <m2tyo8hneu.wl%randy@psg.com>
Subject: Re: Comments on <draft-cooper-privacy-policy-01.txt>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
X-Authenticated: #29516787
X-Flags: 0001
X-Mailer: WWW-Mail 6100 (Global Message Exchange)
X-Priority: 3
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1//Ge43zTf/PW4cxHdE//2oxMdk35nZplXotl2wDd w/qIQsoFG89GEA56rDLeVPtIvQEpR5oyo2jQ==
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-GMX-UID: ziUCeBB3TiE+RoACpWVwuIx9ZUVSRNdm
X-FuHaFi: 0.64000000000000001
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2010 12:16:08 -0000

Hi Randy, 


> [ fwiw, i am not bothered if some folk well-versed in such things
>   develop and put forth a policy about how the ietf treats data
>   about members, attendees, network, ... ]
> 
> > And "yes" we have researchers looking into the traffic, people storing
> > all sorts of data, etc.
> 
> we do?  about our traffic on the ietf meeting network?  stuff other than
> the _ephemeral_ data the noc ops use to manage the network?

Yes, the IETF meeting network. 

> 
> as far as i know
> 
>   o data collection has been done very rarely.  and when it has been, it
>     has been widely announced.

Openness and transparency is one of the privacy principles. 
(but there are others...)


> 
>   o there is no plan known by the net ops to do so in maastricht or
>     beijing at either of those meetings.

I don't know. There is no central place where I could lookup any of this info. 

> 
>   o aside from issues in the wireless deployment, the data about net use
>     at ietf meeings seems pretty boring to me from a research view

Maybe boring for you. 
Some consider it a very large WLAN network, some others test their favorite tunneling technology with it, etc.  

> 
>   o but i am sure there are wifi spies snooping and playing.  and i
>     suspect that they will not be very respectful of any policy put in
>     place.

You have to see all privacy principles in combination in order for them to make sense. 


> 
> given the latter, i focus more on prudent personal net hygene and less
> on prose.
That's fine. 

Ciao
Hannes

> 
> randy