Re: Oauth blog post

Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net> Thu, 02 August 2012 21:50 UTC

Return-Path: <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9170511E814B for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Aug 2012 14:50:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Fa2T3ngPTYyA for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Aug 2012 14:50:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.22]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 276AA11E8127 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Aug 2012 14:50:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 02 Aug 2012 21:50:27 -0000
Received: from dhcp-172b.meeting.ietf.org (EHLO dhcp-172b.meeting.ietf.org) [130.129.23.43] by mail.gmx.net (mp016) with SMTP; 02 Aug 2012 23:50:27 +0200
X-Authenticated: #29516787
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/sibxInuLsxaGAHFhuA4CsMiOVIEqBp5um8BcJit v88oN3PibS3Y2w
Subject: Re: Oauth blog post
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20120730101231.047f2550@resistor.net>
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2012 14:50:24 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <899D5D51-BA0D-49C0-9F30-D94BB40E4EC2@gmx.net>
References: <501531F7.5040404@gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20120729073422.06d8fe10@resistor.net> <39B73AD9-4E8F-4E94-A538-69BE5D8C0E18@gmx.net> <6.2.5.6.2.20120730101231.047f2550@resistor.net>
To: SM <sm@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2012 21:50:31 -0000

Hi SM, 

On Jul 30, 2012, at 10:21 AM, SM wrote:

> Hi Hannes,
> At 12:19 PM 7/29/2012, Hannes Tschofenig wrote:
>> The IETF allows open participation and, as such, everyone, including companies that develop enterprise software, are free to participate in the discussions.
>> 
>> Do you think open participation is wrong?
> 
> It depends on what open participation means in the above.  If it is open participation by companies, I don't have any problem with it as long as the relevant BCPs are updated to reflect that.
> 

I believe you know what open participation in the IETF means. 

In fact, for the IETF openness means more than for many other SDOs where "open" means you can join if you pay a substantial amount of money every year. 

> At 11:14 AM 7/29/2012, Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo) wrote:
>> I would find it useful if anyone of you who likes to agree or disagree to have at least read the OAuth specification. I had noticed that many of those who share their valuable thoughts have not even spent the time to look at the document.
> 
> I wonder whether I read the OAuth2 specifications. :-)

I hope you did. I had also given various tutorials during IETF meetings...

Ciao
Hannes

> 
> Regards,
> -sm