Re: HTML for email

Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com> Tue, 02 March 2021 04:34 UTC

Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B54673A0E60 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Mar 2021 20:34:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.399
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LES1hJBExcrW for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Mar 2021 20:34:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yb1-f173.google.com (mail-yb1-f173.google.com [209.85.219.173]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F4A03A0E59 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Mar 2021 20:34:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yb1-f173.google.com with SMTP id h82so5609095ybc.13 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 01 Mar 2021 20:34:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=iy+p77AzW3ZYTBXCesoFbsmj2OJvbzM2ix+qZvH2FWQ=; b=JbBCMy5qEraninKYaIYkmwF/BF/FhDaKCGZJDG8Hmwabw8Y2YWkTHkoDy26QJfCB/C V1GubOXEX+aCV9dnelfFCGqaICllFL6upS7PLQsZWpYvf/pApJQgnWSSoxup3mdWNjH5 BX4t1OJ4ZBffd6rADrEoFdyJz2DVFj0V7tg6BraLnwJuGAHYDGGXMybucenLeJKVfkql mBtDSZMCGJsGWh74gU0eBIkSe3XH0ErPp1DrzDTbSv1XMnSA8afOx7Wj+oSBkOP9jV4h NP16X96y+NfShdtIjoF2zsqLRNU/2pC8JuBREcp3F6gPcRNdToaTdCTLJqTS5G0AOksM 5beA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532dx0lR5b2Ypn42adxj6cIcUSMhW2wL9lWWwHYVvt/nOkOpzIcJ SgiORAWeAB1TuD7dqdsFHOzOpkh1SJUhQRSBQaw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyKFa3MY09U2ip/BqBsTDQyb/KuNE0gUAlMdxFWaflDGAvCJwiaAPnX6de5HOYsc1MLbXDwyJnwUGUiUZAKlrA=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:2f43:: with SMTP id v64mr27706692ybv.302.1614659643163; Mon, 01 Mar 2021 20:34:03 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20210227190200.06ED46F10439@ary.qy> <4064.1614454347@localhost> <s1f0vo$ejp$1@gal.iecc.com> <59240886-320d-fae3-6b98-7b83dacaf5e7@network-heretics.com> <CAMm+LwhWCsG68GOws-Zm9TDcEZ4trGBhq7Dm-_0Ci8Ri7kDK=Q@mail.gmail.com> <603D2360.1070406@btconnect.com> <01f901d70ec0$aa28cfb0$fe7a6f10$@acm.org> <20210301233000.GK30153@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <20210301233000.GK30153@localhost>
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2021 23:33:52 -0500
Message-ID: <CAMm+Lwj8Zmn--rOtZ-N7NvXE0zjdW96wB_zASG4Mn68S6JoZYA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: HTML for email
To: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
Cc: Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org>, tom petch <daedulus@btconnect.com>, Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>, IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000076c7b105bc863e15"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/tsDEGBQwQUNXy8_1QrShDt8wNAc>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2021 04:34:07 -0000

On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 6:30 PM Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 09:31:06AM -0800, Larry Masinter wrote:
> > There's been no interest in the email community for defining a "for
> > email" profile of HTML and multipart/related (or WPACK).  Why is that?
>
> Maybe because we don't like any of it and none of us is being paid to do
> it.
>

Been there, did that.

draft-hallambaker-mesh-dare-11 - Mathematical Mesh 3.0 Part III : Data At
Rest Encryption (DARE) (ietf.org)
<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hallambaker-mesh-dare-11>

Of course, not working for a company that rhymes with Sproogle, nobody
seemed interested.

I shipped code implementing that one two years ago.