IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IETF privacy policy - still a bad idea

"John R. Levine" <johnl@iecc.com> Sat, 24 July 2010 16:36 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F32EC3A69BC for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 24 Jul 2010 09:36:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.239
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.239 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.063, BAYES_00=-2.599, DATE_IN_FUTURE_06_12=1.897, HABEAS_ACCREDITED_SOI=-4.3, RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED=-4.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mxSNk1MOgqE0 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 24 Jul 2010 09:36:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [64.57.183.53]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AA2B3A690C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 24 Jul 2010 09:36:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 33613 invoked from network); 24 Jul 2010 16:31:47 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent:cleverness; s=k1007; bh=hrPa3hY4gJJRmK1hDLMXDQBvjru0ovBXpgci9f1dyOM=; b=lajrcIjL29aAMf2Gs40ttPQ5xHx9CGYGo7gzmm/pK1/EuylIp3mtAMuzvKatmKsTATIiY3EsAyQJx3OEJTE3Lbew1lNoTqNn7UDkoqwsBsCXPfygAV3wpJxKuw4B1+VA4RR7pGWIuNC1E3bxFfRAkOwG6CSpdwHf1OtajGsnxg8=
Received: (ofmipd 64.57.183.62) with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 24 Jul 2010 16:31:24 -0000
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2010 18:36:32 -0400
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1007241831100.1584@joyce.lan>
From: "John R. Levine" <johnl@iecc.com>
To: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: IETF privacy policy - still a bad idea
In-Reply-To: <CF9D8943-5A46-4BCA-9A2A-27CBFFA04038@cisco.com>
References: <20100721223355.1728.qmail@joyce.lan> <CF9D8943-5A46-4BCA-9A2A-27CBFFA04038@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23)
Cleverness: None detected
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2010 16:36:20 -0000

> The IETF has a legal home, named ISOC. Let me rephrase: "Do you think 
> ISOC is not subject to the laws of Europe?"

Of course they are.  But that's OK, since ISOC has had a privacy policy in 
place since 2006, which makes specific reference to the "safe harbor" 
policy kludge worked out between the US and EU:

http://www.isoc.org/help/privacy/

> Good grief.

Indeed.  Do we agree that this means we're done?

R's,
John

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email