Re: Disappointing take-up of Gather.Town

John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Fri, 31 July 2020 03:38 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 524183A0BF7 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 20:38:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=q55FzyZ7; dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=T2ii62cZ
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zBxTDC-sGEft for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 20:38:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 371BB3A0BF2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 20:38:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 12393 invoked from network); 31 Jul 2020 03:38:24 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=3067.5f239230.k2007; bh=ReTnNJ6drZ3O7VkUjpnGRvu3xfMrqA8F4AjJ4MUoud8=; b=q55FzyZ7ynmgCcRIrYZlIxUs0Qm5SzNfzwVj+UBJ6xOJ7oNjdPCCOkD0OUQq1AEPZL+D6li9lASti00+SiFikHcdgoGW1nqakKd1+mac9mPbXNgvom295H6uVhFdl7YYAn8+43rLmKevStX32R9+wbn2p+5leuKh+6KYjGpCB9QR5DS/w0V4e4TsreoyQO9Y+Wj7SKghYT+8j3+QOcBA7RXP7YJPTvpeReyZUFrJwiecvwoAGZ2jzG/DuiGdMtpB
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=3067.5f239230.k2007; bh=ReTnNJ6drZ3O7VkUjpnGRvu3xfMrqA8F4AjJ4MUoud8=; b=T2ii62cZiYDaY6QmtWBJGXVyHUNuMgd4wHEvxUdgB9b4bBZ8B+n5SNPX/tHWogg0P99erj+bvp7FqUQAEDHd9BE8ZSUlUXPoqFMDAUgyEnFYVVb5Iv3vPSHrPN35qcqH4jQ2XPR9MNwrpkc5jUAfYiDTwXMqyfgt/2WfFqXoR9pUNXcOT013AfKWiZqIS5PFFZVeWoZAg1Bh1MB2MBH8MGEvGu/SfrtOu+CaOmdX+2A77/ANBqKFY1w9rk5j81rx
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.2 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD) via TCP6; 31 Jul 2020 03:38:23 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id 9FE261DAD103; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 23:38:23 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 23:38:23 -0400
Message-Id: <20200731033823.9FE261DAD103@ary.qy>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Disappointing take-up of Gather.Town
In-Reply-To: <024001d66664$ebdc3b90$c394b2b0$@olddog.co.uk>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/u0CKltF5b5D7vu-uDo174KjcyKA>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 03:38:28 -0000

In article <024001d66664$ebdc3b90$c394b2b0$@olddog.co.uk> you write:
>But where is everybody? The number of people in the application seems to
>range between 20 and 50. 
>
>Is the problem that Gather.Town makes you run all sorts of scripts that
>might be a bit icky? Or are we all really just antisocial?

Gather.town seems to me to be a work in progress. The way it leaves
the camera on even if the window isn't visible is clearly a bug (even
if it was intentional.)

I think it would help to take a tip from jabber and other IM apps and
provide people a way to provide hints about whether they want people
to talk to them, and also particularly if the window isn't visible,
if someone asks to talk, a way to pop up a request to which you can say
yes or various kinds of no's.  This would make it a lot less painful to
leave it active while you're doing other stuff.

If we want to make virtual meetings more like real ones, when you
leave a meetecho session it should dump you into the virtual hallway,
not the agenda.



-- 
Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly