Re: San Francisco?

John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> Mon, 19 April 2021 00:20 UTC

Return-Path: <john-ietf@jck.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C4C33A1413 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 17:20:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.004
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.004 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id avyxYCLyjNO4 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 17:20:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bsa3.jck.com (static-65-175-133-136.nh.cpe.atlanticbb.net [65.175.133.136]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 542703A1415 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 17:20:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hp5.int.jck.com ([198.252.137.153] helo=JcK-HP5) by bsa3.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <john-ietf@jck.com>) id 1lYHcc-000DRm-SP; Sun, 18 Apr 2021 20:18:38 -0400
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2021 20:18:18 -0400
From: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
To: Michael Tuexen <michael.tuexen@lurchi.franken.de>, Andrew Campling <andrew.campling@419.consulting>
cc: Marc Petit-Huguenin <marc@petit-huguenin.org>, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: San Francisco?
Message-ID: <7D5B423C39E112F2F330F4B4@JcK-HP5>
In-Reply-To: <94B3FD53-FD17-46B3-9BAA-6439A698970B@lurchi.franken.de>
References: <40d46beb-d1a8-ef04-7968-94d5daf2384f@petit-huguenin.org> <LO2P265MB0399F422FD5DECB81F9A5B56C24A9@LO2P265MB0399.GBRP265.PRO D.OUTLOOK.COM> <94B3FD53-FD17-46B3-9BAA-6439A698970B@lurchi.franken.de>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/u0hGVN3dQZ2mxFK_yLYcI7mqu7g>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 00:20:21 -0000

You apparently have not seen it, but the announcement was sent
out some hours ago that IETF 111 will be online.  Reading
ietf-announce is often helpful.

 https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/nqPCMpAcN5KEF
AXulGITbpurvi0/

    john


--On Monday, 19 April, 2021 01:02 +0200 Michael Tuexen
<michael.tuexen@lurchi.franken.de> wrote:

>> On 18. Apr 2021, at 21:15, Andrew Campling
>> <andrew.campling@419.consulting> wrote:
>> 
>> The announcement does appear to be overdue.  Whilst these
>> things happen, it would be good to have an update to confirm
>> when the announcement is now expected.  
> https://www.ietf.org/how/meetings/111/
> 
> Best regards
> Michael
>> 
>> Andrew
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Marc Petit-Huguenin <marc@petit-huguenin.org> 
>> Sent: 17 April 2021 20:21
>> To: ietf@ietf.org
>> Subject: San Francisco?
>> 
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/111/important-dates/
>> 
>> "2021-04-16 (Friday): Announcement of whether the meeting
>> will be in-person or online."	
>> 
>> Did I miss the announcement?
>> 
>> Thanks.
>> 
>> -- 
>> Marc Petit-Huguenin
>> Email: marc@petit-huguenin.org
>> Blog: https://marc.petit-huguenin.org
>> Profile: https://www.linkedin.com/in/petithug
>> 
>> 
>