RE: Scenario C or Scenario O ?

graham.travers@bt.com Fri, 24 September 2004 16:04 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA20488; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 12:04:37 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CAsfr-0004Ql-1P; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 12:11:55 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CAsRp-0001tW-BC; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 11:57:25 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CAsNM-00017N-9m for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 11:52:48 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA19804 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 11:52:46 -0400 (EDT)
From: graham.travers@bt.com
Received: from smtp2.smtp.bt.com ([217.32.164.150]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CAsUN-0004DJ-Hr for ietf@ietf.org; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 12:00:04 -0400
Received: from i2km98-ukbr.domain1.systemhost.net ([193.113.197.85]) by smtp2.smtp.bt.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.80); Fri, 24 Sep 2004 16:53:05 +0100
Received: from i2km02-ukbr.domain1.systemhost.net ([193.113.197.79]) by i2km98-ukbr.domain1.systemhost.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Fri, 24 Sep 2004 16:53:05 +0100
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6487.1
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 16:53:05 +0100
Message-ID: <3D67CCA7D63E714B980D21A038EEA08E0F531D03@i2km02-ukbr.domain1.systemhost.net>
Thread-Topic: Scenario C or Scenario O ?
Thread-Index: AcShsBaB+kxH53w8Ru2c2CwrVLGLPwAmkqDw
To: ietf@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Sep 2004 15:53:05.0064 (UTC) FILETIME=[94318A80:01C4A24E]
X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: e8a67952aa972b528dd04570d58ad8fe
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: Scenario C or Scenario O ?
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: f60d0f7806b0c40781eee6b9cd0b2135
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Disclaimer:  I haven't read all of the Scenario O and Scenario C
proposals. 
( Yes, I am sitting two rows away from my screen. )

On the subject of a new incorporated entity ( Scenario C ) versus an
already incorporated entity ( Scenario O ), the arguments in my mind
stack up thus:

Scenario C:
Some risk ( e.g. of obtaining tax-free status );
Some delay ( may not be critical );
Extra cost - lawyer, accountant, clerical people, etc. needed;
More focus on IETF administration ?
New relationship needed with ISOC, as well as with the IETF.

Scenario O:
Less risk ( e.g. temporary cover if the administrative entity person
should "fold" );
Less delay;
Economies of scale - lawyer, accountant, clerical people, etc. already
employed by ISOC ( admittedly more may be needed );
Diluted focus ? ( I don't quite buy this, if the entity is set up
specifically to handle IETF admin and nothing else. )
No external relationship with ISOC needed.   ISOC / IETF relationship
already well established.

No doubt there are more pros and cons, if anyone wants to do a proper
SWAT analysis.


On what I've seen and thought so far, I prefer Scenario O.


	Regards,

	Graham Travers

	International Standards Manager
	BT Group

	e-mail:   graham.travers@bt.com
	tel:        +44(0) 1359 235086
	mobile:  +44(0) 7808 502536
          HWB279, PO Box 200,London, N18 1ZF, UK

BT Group plc
Registered office: 81 Newgate Street London EC1A 7AJ
Registered in England and Wales no. 4190816 This electronic message
contains information from BT Group plc which may be privileged or
confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the
individual(s) or entity named above. If you are not the intended
recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of
the contents of this information is prohibited. If you have received
this electronic message in error, please notify us by telephone or email
(to the numbers or address above) immediately. Activity and use of the
BT Group plc E-mail system is monitored to secure its effective
operation and for other lawful business purposes. Communications using
this system will also be monitored and may be recorded to secure
effective operation and for other lawful business purposes. 





_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf