IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: problem dealing w/ ietf.org mail servers

Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Tue, 08 July 2008 18:41 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4FAB3A6931; Tue, 8 Jul 2008 11:41:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 958C63A6931 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Jul 2008 11:41:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.849
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.849 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.250, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P4EA4OYQRGRr for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Jul 2008 11:41:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from m1.imap-partners.net (m1.imap-partners.net [64.13.152.131]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2B5F3A67B2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Jul 2008 11:41:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lust.indecency.org (mail.fiveman.com [72.242.14.234] (may be forged)) by m1.imap-partners.net (MOS 3.8.4-GA) with ESMTP id AWI80088 (AUTH admin@network-heretics.com) for ietf@ietf.org; Tue, 8 Jul 2008 11:41:34 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4873B4DC.90800@network-heretics.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2008 14:41:32 -0400
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Macintosh/20080421)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>
Subject: Re: problem dealing w/ ietf.org mail servers
References: <013301c8dca5$22ca0a80$685e1f80$@us> <20080703054752.GM6185@lark.songbird.com> <20080703134655.GA17472@boreas.isi.edu> <486CDAE1.4040905@spaghetti.zurich.ibm.com> <F06CDCB1-D97B-4BB9-8F0D-8BB3CCC96A86@kurtis.pp.se> <06595477BCEAFD54D608797C@p3.JCK.COM> <0E3112A0-B01B-40D7-AE82-6E1D9EAC94D6@kurtis.pp.se>
In-Reply-To: <0E3112A0-B01B-40D7-AE82-6E1D9EAC94D6@kurtis.pp.se>
Cc: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, ietf@ietf.org, Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>, Jeroen Massar <jeroen@unfix.org>, Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

> 1) I do understand where the current "last 64 bits are EUId" comes from.
> 
> 2) Someone (I think it was Keith Moore) said that if the scheme doesn't 
> work for servers AND hosts (i.e no difference) it's a bad scheme. I sort 
> of agree with that, but the reason it doesn't work for servers is simply 
> lack of management tools, and the fact that a lot of protocols / 
> implementations tend to use addresses rather than names.

I disagree that it doesn't work for servers.   (Or it would be better to 
say that I'd like to know why you think it doesn't work for servers.)

Keith
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email