IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work

Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> Sun, 04 April 2021 09:08 UTC

Return-Path: <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AFB33A1E24 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Apr 2021 02:08:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yoWseiobojZx for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Apr 2021 02:08:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp [131.112.32.132]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id B1CD53A1E23 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Apr 2021 02:08:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 24977 invoked from network); 4 Apr 2021 08:46:07 -0000
Received: from necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (131.112.32.132) by necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp with SMTP; 4 Apr 2021 08:46:07 -0000
Subject: Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <859352252.4167919.1617264911078.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <859352252.4167919.1617264911078@mail.yahoo.com> <85575541-C896-4530-B028-C0DF9BA3EA8B@ietf.org> <411426886.24320.1617306016731@appsuite-gw2.open-xchange.com> <20210401195735.GA3828@localhost> <20210402032059.GD79563@kduck.mit.edu> <1e4feea2-2c81-b31a-04e3-d4c9a4adbaf7@lounge.org> <20210402163230.GH79563@kduck.mit.edu> <4c82de79-1e40-2eed-909b-8a288284393d@lounge.org> <439a33c9-5791-4c90-76a3-54aab828a37d@network-heretics.com> <5C955F3B-2EE7-43DD-85BA-DA1C1CF353F1@tzi.org> <7b3ba302-ec36-eb8d-7461-861a0b6651ac@network-heretics.com> <08123BD6-D3A4-4940-8EE1-5D4A55B03093@akamai.com>
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Message-ID: <f348de67-2fb2-2395-c54a-b323882dc692@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2021 18:08:43 +0900
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <08123BD6-D3A4-4940-8EE1-5D4A55B03093@akamai.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/uFJQB2A6UGLSMDIE1JkDE3ES1PA>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2021 09:08:53 -0000

Salz, Rich wrote:

>> The two “Les White” drafts weren’t humor, they were intended to
>> incite discord, not foster discourse.
> 
> Respectfully, I interpreted them differently.
> 
> They had all the hallmarks of trying to stir things up for their own
> sake. Notably, to me, a childish pseudonym.

"to me"? Maybe. But, to confirm it with diversified view, could you
explain your points by quoting original text or, better, with
restored links to the original text?

Just stating one-sided view without reasons is not constructive.

							Masataka Ohta

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email