IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Enough DMARC whinging

Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net> Fri, 02 May 2014 04:31 UTC

Return-Path: <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 517061A8840 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 May 2014 21:31:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hfYseO2gqpAY for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 May 2014 21:31:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from server1.neighborhoods.net (server1.neighborhoods.net [207.154.13.48]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CDB81A09A7 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 May 2014 21:31:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by server1.neighborhoods.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E9D6CC0AA for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 May 2014 00:31:08 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.6.2 (20081215) (Debian) at neighborhoods.net
Received: from server1.neighborhoods.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (server1.neighborhoods.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id fiie3A0npqGp for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 May 2014 00:30:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from new-host.home (pool-173-76-155-14.bstnma.fios.verizon.net [173.76.155.14]) by server1.neighborhoods.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 924F6CC0A5 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 May 2014 00:30:59 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <53631F83.408@meetinghouse.net>
Date: Fri, 02 May 2014 00:30:59 -0400
From: Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:28.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/28.0 SeaMonkey/2.25
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Enough DMARC whinging
References: <CAMm+Lwh0Sc2wtvjEAjOMi4emDzyF4JWmmzYr5QEFcmyoKtkTAA@mail.gmail.com> <CAA=duU0i1Ppc-nMeWL-ipms4E4b0wpsSRZdLG+2YhujPgH-ZPQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAMm+LwikJhO5R6UqWx8qUswMptgTw_wF6E6_9Ok=SRYTBChYgA@mail.gmail.com> <CAA=duU3scwm=j2BJ6jq4k5zRQPkXOVOR1UscQqZZ8tG5HEZTwQ@mail.gmail.com> <536113B1.5070309@bbiw.net> <CAMm+LwiXoW3p5uCmML4kAWXnbrrAnSCK9x5U2qeHJdVgR2r_Gg@mail.gmail.com> <CAA=duU2uVtv84-P=aEBhvU_xyBo6LktnpcQuWmx18_e6FgyjUQ@mail.gmail.com> <53631F0A.40602@dougbarton.us>
In-Reply-To: <53631F0A.40602@dougbarton.us>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/uGN47dstFU37BUNLBdcjHCfL-5k
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 May 2014 04:31:12 -0000

Doug Barton wrote:
> On 05/01/2014 08:07 AM, Andrew G. Malis wrote:
>> Phillip,
>>
>>     And to the other conversations, we are talking about draft- here. 
>> And
>>     that isn't the same as standard. In fact one of the requirements for
>>     being granted standard would be to come up with answers to these
>>     issues.
>>
>>
>> I could not agree with you more, EXCEPT in this case major service
>> providers (Yahoo, AOL, etc.) are already treating it as a standard, have
>> implemented it  ...
>
> Rough consensus and running code.

VERY rough

-- 
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is.   .... Yogi Berra

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email