Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to savingthe Internet from the NSA

Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com> Fri, 06 September 2013 13:45 UTC

Return-Path: <scott.brim@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDB6A11E818B for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 06:45:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.374
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.374 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.226, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xTG-GvBdwiXD for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 06:45:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oa0-x229.google.com (mail-oa0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::229]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A82D11E8128 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 06:45:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oa0-f41.google.com with SMTP id j6so3918453oag.14 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 06 Sep 2013 06:45:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=dG3u+4PqazFZMynpIsjbG/wc2TNeZIQvMlf9oMJKUk4=; b=y4akpCQWZIE+yBAHGSfmkQazyF6PySSXW9sm36KtfaKd96MORdsrvrmhCz66mkBgmM pwl7EW7RFQfGaS+Bt1YMB5uG1Ayf8+YZ+kqG8sOywscj6BmI9n3VqeEp63ZNZwhOcXFm FxwHFcdZjGslIkwoxkoT6tLd6zygXM6tWeuh8hDYKOsG3IBBoRysX26XnIQSs3bKzmcw 37ixVywXTL797MVjAhGvX4RLG/uDr2vYVI8v4a3n9T747/0GnUf127vx00bVhVNVSRWj ed/oJGGwmrui4TI3ciVC5HjIT2NAzZB/rrUiJmoTJk97fQ0RsVVhJIIjTP8vkeKKCgPW HvLA==
X-Received: by 10.182.225.162 with SMTP id rl2mr1924649obc.72.1378475146816; Fri, 06 Sep 2013 06:45:46 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.44.105 with HTTP; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 06:45:26 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5229D6B0.1040709@qti.qualcomm.com>
References: <5F053C0B-4678-4680-A8BF-62FF282ADDCE@softarmor.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1309051743130.47262@hiroshima.bogus.com> <52293197.1060809@gmail.com> <CAMm+LwjdN478yyU=J7=GTpQxqtdgP8wtdEtna50X+WtA-bV3hg@mail.gmail.com> <52294BDC.4060707@gmail.com> <20130906033254.GH62204@mx1.yitter.info> <CAMm+Lwg9kJymBWaEXwZfQ=P5Uo-UmYoNvvzewnXjUu+mhg+QTQ@mail.gmail.com> <006001ceaad6$61f39640$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <5229D6B0.1040709@qti.qualcomm.com>
From: Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2013 09:45:26 -0400
Message-ID: <CAPv4CP9A8an0KipcB2W_rLMk4WXYqi5DXzkz5OMqfAj_qqMBCw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to savingthe Internet from the NSA
To: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2013 13:45:49 -0000

I wouldn't focus on government surveillance per se.  The IETF should
consider that breaking privacy is much easier than it used to be,
particularly given consolidation of services at all layers, and take
that into account in our engineering best practices.  Our mission is
to make the Internet better, and right now the Internet's weakness in
privacy is far from "better".  The mandatory security considerations
section should become security and privacy considerations.  The
privacy RFC should be expanded and worded more strongly than just nice
suggestions.  Perhaps the Nomcom should ask candidates about their
understanding of privacy considerations.

Scott