RE: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Proposed Standard

This empty appendix was removed in draft 02.

As Russ stated before, an IPR disclosure has been posted to the IETF IPR
page which can be found at:

Stefan Santesson
Program Manager, Standards Liaison
Windows Security

-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Strahm [mailto:bill@strahm.net] 
Sent: den 20 februari 2006 02:21
To: Russ Housley
Cc: Bill Fenner; tls@ietf.org; ietf@ietf.org; iesg@ietf.org; Steven M.
Bellovin
Subject: Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Proposed
Standard

I saw all of the huff, and while I agree with it, I am more concerned
about

Appendix A. IPR Disclosure

    TBD

What does that mean, and more specifically is a document with a TBD 
section really ready for last call at all ?

Bill
Russ Housley wrote:
> I misunderstood the original question.  I'll get it fixed or withdraw 
> the Last Call.
> 
> Russ
> 
> 
> At 12:38 AM 2/19/2006, Bill Fenner wrote:
> 
>> >Can we have a Proposed Standard
>> >without the IETF having change control?
>>
>> No.  RFC3978 says, in section 5.2 where it describes the derivative
>> works limitation that's present in draft-santesson-tls-ume, "These
>> notices may not be used with any standards-track document".
>>
>>   Bill
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf