Re: Next steps towards a net zero IETF

Andrew McConachie <andrew@depht.com> Sat, 25 March 2023 10:49 UTC

Return-Path: <andrew@depht.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1025C14CE40 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 25 Mar 2023 03:49:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.597
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oM1B5yhbWUoa for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 25 Mar 2023 03:49:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout-b-206.mailbox.org (mout-b-206.mailbox.org [195.10.208.51]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2833BC14CE2F for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 25 Mar 2023 03:49:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp2.mailbox.org (smtp2.mailbox.org [10.196.197.2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-384) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mout-b-206.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4PkG6T6qYWz9sqJ; Sat, 25 Mar 2023 11:49:21 +0100 (CET)
From: Andrew McConachie <andrew@depht.com>
To: Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Next steps towards a net zero IETF
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2023 11:48:48 +0100
Message-ID: <4224F236-75B3-4107-A14F-1395147EBFE3@depht.com>
In-Reply-To: <1b37b32f-3166-fbbb-dfc7-070f06c9215b@huitema.net>
References: <02F23373-9F6A-420E-91B3-C1ADE5AF2A60@staff.ietf.org> <928d9a46-ff69-12df-fc30-b0ff7f1f8cec@huitema.net> <B8DF18B2-77A2-4A6B-962A-DEFBB1EDFF5A@staff.ietf.org> <316ff116-535a-d0c0-31e8-ff2ca3fe5871@lear.ch> <97d4fa2f-6ba0-ff49-1e8a-a1d6ea13d8ad@gmail.com> <CACQW0EqZbM5NGE8Yy7c5d3UEsx+1rF8k3nv0_fR14nvLygkz+A@mail.gmail.com> <79bf9526-b521-1c77-eacb-172735de02e7@earthlink.net> <1b37b32f-3166-fbbb-dfc7-070f06c9215b@huitema.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"; markup="markdown"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/uQ_1j8ybETnn9yyQOZd1vta_zdQ>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IETF-Discussion. This is the most general IETF mailing list, intended for discussion of technical, procedural, operational, and other topics for which no dedicated mailing lists exist." <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2023 10:49:32 -0000


On 21 Mar 2023, at 23:59, Christian Huitema wrote:

> On 3/21/2023 3:40 PM, Charlie Perkins wrote:
>> Hello folks,
>>
>> I do not intend to express any opinion on the merits of carbon 
>> offsets, IETF investigations, etc.  However:
>>
>> On 3/21/2023 3:06 PM, Alexander Pelov wrote:
>>>
>>> I have never chartered an airplane to go to a meeting, and none of 
>>> the people I know have done so. I don't know of any hotel having 
>>> been built for an IETF meeting, and although I tend to eat out more 
>>> at in-person meetings, I try sticking to 3 meals a day (cookies 
>>> don't count).
>>>
>>> Did London, or Prague, or Singapore see bigger planes arrive for the 
>>> IETF? Or more of them?
>>
>> This is a good example of the "tragedy of the commons".  Every 
>> consumer may feel that no one will experience any pain if they just 
>> take a little bit.
>
> Individual choices to matter.
>
> The problem that Alexander Pelov mentions is not new. I remember 
> studying it in economic classes pretty much just after the relation 
> between demand, supply and prices. If I am in the station, the gates 
> of the train are about to close, nobody else will come in, and there 
> are empty seats, why wont the railroad company just let me in without 
> a ticket? The short answer is "because capitalism", but the long 
> answer is that the number of cars in the train and the frequency of 
> the trains depend on expected traffic -- schedule too few and you 
> loose market share, schedule too many and you loose money.
>
> Same goes for planes, or for that matter for elections. Your 
> individual vote alone cannot probably change an election, but if many 
> people vote the same way the result will indeed change.
>

Trains and planes are fundamentally different in this regard, because 
planes calculate their weight at takeoff and only take as much fuel as 
they need. The amount of CO2 produced by a passenger plane is directly 
proportional to how many passengers it’s carrying.

I wasn’t aware how detailed these calculations can be until I read 
this incident report of a miscalculation.
<https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/604f423be90e077fdf88493f/Boeing_737-8K5_G-TAWG_04-21.pdf>

--Andrew