Re: On email and web security
Doug Royer <douglasroyer@gmail.com> Fri, 01 January 2016 20:37 UTC
Return-Path: <douglasroyer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 315801A8A7F for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Jan 2016 12:37:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mLq6quQXxzHQ for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Jan 2016 12:37:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pa0-x229.google.com (mail-pa0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C49541A8928 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Jan 2016 12:37:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pa0-x229.google.com with SMTP id uo6so145748257pac.1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 01 Jan 2016 12:37:24 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:organization:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type; bh=kbRGKR1//iGMGdcrdnSCPawFuBlj1+bBxODjUaagat4=; b=q/wEuV7ylbydfbdzv5+xlYBUGKMifP9ZbWIRG7mET1Tm/vBGuzG2e10I5MZ2gNFKUC 1RL+rzZQPnJSymktfuaKX3DFea7Yqg6tipztcT32sBNt4aSWACfVmBvCgoSJtWYoCcKl sziFSuOxyzA8InGXh2dtFt2U/+in4C4dqFbv8UGPEAWTc45qA9cJGwEzYZ4V45VyVFfU Sy1+0KsXsscGfmJdHAwWqpTt6nlZDkbuDnnfBM4oY0xqYi8PDzKa/o4k5/3/PL0P8BWq d+gp+Z+szRWSS4832rBYWo7lWDVZl7dnfWBB1l0W/3MeTnqq3qOGJ2W/YO1HtH/vWBIg 6TKQ==
X-Received: by 10.66.101.3 with SMTP id fc3mr69425762pab.2.1451680644451; Fri, 01 Jan 2016 12:37:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.4] ([75.174.27.88]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id kk5sm93022141pab.16.2016.01.01.12.37.23 for <ietf@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 01 Jan 2016 12:37:23 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: On email and web security
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <304F200F-CF0B-4C23-91F9-BFC06C41BDA8@cisco.com>
From: Doug Royer <douglasroyer@gmail.com>
Organization: http://SoftwareAndServices.NET
Message-ID: <5686E386.70008@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Jan 2016 13:37:26 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <304F200F-CF0B-4C23-91F9-BFC06C41BDA8@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"; boundary="------------ms070302000404090302010302"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/uQyDJ-MkX28sxqfrR1h-FYaMj6c>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jan 2016 20:37:27 -0000
On 12/30/2015 01:17 PM, Fred Baker (fred) wrote: > ... > > First, I note that this email is going out unencrypted. Why? Confused - for private lists -I see your point. For public lists, what would you want still private after the email is publicly listed on the IETF email-list web servers? -- Doug Royer - (http://K7DMR.us / http://DougRoyer.US) DouglasRoyer@gmail.com 714-989-6135
- On email and web security Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: On email and web security Paul Wouters
- Re: On email and web security Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: On email and web security Fernando Gont
- Re: On email and web security IETF Chair
- Re: On email and web security John Levine
- Re: On email and web security Michael Richardson
- Re: On email and web security Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: On email and web security Doug Royer
- Re: On email and web security Doug Royer
- Re: On email and web security Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: On email and web security Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: On email and web security l.wood
- Re: On email and web security Steve Crocker
- Re: On email and web security John Levine
- Re: On email and web security Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: On email and web security Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: On email and web security Doug Barton
- Re: On email and web security Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: On email and web security Doug Barton
- Re: On email and web security Dave Cridland
- Re: On email and web security Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: On email and web security Doug Barton
- Re: On email and web security Doug Royer
- Re: On email and web security Matthew Kerwin
- Re: On email and web security Doug Royer
- Re: On email and web security John Levine
- Re: On email and web security Doug Barton
- Re: On email and web security John Levine
- Re: On email and web security Doug Barton
- Re: On email and web security Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: On email and web security George Michaelson