IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: .org sale - bidding process

Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> Sat, 18 January 2020 04:33 UTC

Return-Path: <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 760831200BA for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 20:33:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OjJJ0kJez5Av for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 20:33:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-il1-x130.google.com (mail-il1-x130.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 142F612004A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 20:33:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-il1-x130.google.com with SMTP id t8so23041593iln.4 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 20:33:53 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=YUXxXFVKMFdg3/qWga69gv8ObylUsh1ziChvidOmU1w=; b=eyPvEYkauwjxUzdnWENpwApWH+zTqXIj8ufsQF7SOsxiezwN3iVW+UEBwUOoNYOu0r 4dfaevThgkj0QDFTGang9XfK9F6V9sGLHMhbeU3GHepJ/uaOls0DK3wHeKCRb591JYva Tl/90wnVyiBYoSXqID6e3+de7qsH8AFgSovY5a/O5ID0FbhPWxjD9FbXVjKMluu2UcPi PJuk3Q47+YaegkDmfxehvVZwCVeTsGOyNiOJlwdTNHD5wjOqX/AceWx5o87wmz+7t1my bt3LtCI8Iz3dXlgi4CXaDwcmQhvnfp/Znfuwam3jmInPBcdQqBXeqWs98taFxR8Qspm6 BW3w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=YUXxXFVKMFdg3/qWga69gv8ObylUsh1ziChvidOmU1w=; b=Vw9/OCQhzAxLhRg+NMh8ivCh2ex3xfO2pZ7N7KF7bNkAyCWF6hT5hR6AwvqyQEFwNo gIWNrRoF0Sch3abh4fcQpaWT8u61PKe4BA2D9KyQeZSrhnIECQTi8MsLknmYHjGT/IeN 8JRYpc00gNUYFl0wHgc3dEnfTeo9thOx7LDpCMzUMVpOsRs/m116w4WsK1XrkPrVIOQM GXIUUIrVoF5Z6RW0oigCmdsShc3QO39mkWlpy0ZBn2qE9A22ubdurdSo4w1HWYXVfHft DvxUVZKiwYBTv37kMd2TFricOE1ORxJIS3fkhIDwkt5VLWt3Fvj89h4Sw0O4jfbe3zVE fGOQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWempNucUMRW16vhFZVEILwEVURljQjzxn1MkhEWW0mACrULQv/ gbs2xnHCvFLC13MvCEfn+2KD4BR68LPIBdztOUg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz6ELKWdpfalrNUQw7GxqJ5lHE+6NTGkj5iHIXQeJuGFmoRxUEOgw3xUJnfdpn6gJYzgAk7ns5bQxGAnBo+bxU=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:498d:: with SMTP id k13mr1698859ilg.254.1579322032292; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 20:33:52 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAChr6SzL7NcnEQ7J7C+zxF28faHUzHOPQuhtuNCN6z9Z1M9Hvg@mail.gmail.com> <20200117174531.tzvaerhqtkwzkxhj@mx4.yitter.info> <m2muallp1e.wl-randy@psg.com> <CABcZeBMTm8jyxWyBUn1yYRuuCwgTnj8ME16vOSfU-N2ZbNopyg@mail.gmail.com> <CAChr6SzDH5y-qA5LMUv9Uo6nJhMd7Aw74w4zVATbe5vCSAGkZw@mail.gmail.com> <CA+9kkMA54raBQcQ9MpM2Okvhtz7w3PCLUJb7x05LuWduvXgdPQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+9kkMA54raBQcQ9MpM2Okvhtz7w3PCLUJb7x05LuWduvXgdPQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 20:33:40 -0800
Message-ID: <CAChr6SyeO6C==R81YoRyrNHsGOpK9Txs9k7uTFy3JFcvdpoC4w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: .org sale - bidding process
To: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, Andrew Sullivan <sullivan@isoc.org>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000b88932059c629096"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/udpO7tPzNA7I6r8vApotLx2_TzQ>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2020 04:33:55 -0000

On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 5:23 PM Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> It's important to note that while different groups make appointments to
> the Board, Internet Society Trustees do not represent specific
> constituencies after elections.  Each Trustees serves the organization as a
> whole.   Whatever expectations you have of the board, you should have them
> of all of them, not simply those appointed by the IETF.
>

Thank you for your opinion. It seems a bit strained to insist that
appointees don't represent those who appointed them, but I would like to
know more about this view.

thanks,
Rob

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email