Re: Useful summary for [e-mail]

[Stephane Bortzmeyer <[e-mail]>]

On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 09:41:33PM +0300,
 Hannes Tschofenig <[e-mail]> wrote 
 a message of 46 lines which said:

> Rather than providing these types of summaries it would make more
> sense to provide a conclusion of the individual discussions. This,
> btw, often does not happen in working groups either. As a consequent
> nobody knows (after a long discussion) whether there was a
> conclusion or what the conclusion could have been.

Before trying to summarize the (very open) discussions on the IETF
general mailing list, a good start would be to summarize IESG
evaluations... I would be interested to know, for instance, why
draft-ietf-mboned-addrarch or draft-michaelson-4byte-as-representation
were not approved by IESG (there is certainly a good reason, but to
extract it from datatracker is not obvious).

_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf