IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Concerns about Singapore

"Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com> Mon, 11 April 2016 14:34 UTC

Return-Path: <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2079C12EFA4 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 07:34:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.702
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.702 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=joelhalpern.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rvj-Gi5DrnlH for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 07:34:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from maila2.tigertech.net (maila2.tigertech.net [208.80.4.152]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2F4D12EFA3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 07:34:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by maila2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FDB4253617; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 07:34:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=joelhalpern.com; s=1.tigertech; t=1460385277; bh=Q0UP21uvbuaxl6Wzq3gBoxBb41LzeOBivNow6lAvY2k=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=Vkb3fOsWI+Jf2A/23HZV89BaeOpUE4K8DLrJpWUXSKrcn2nUn4aoAiTVdiYNkeiuR Xh/k2hCkbx5gsGDrjAQJPJPT3nFG87vITZRyN6I42t8Te3NIfa3j65oqKLg31eQYD0 4VeUUcUnAzqbJ6SXv+CwJakA3oprPJgYOAELAQoQ=
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at maila2.tigertech.net
Received: from Joels-MacBook-Pro.local (209-255-163-147.ip.mcleodusa.net [209.255.163.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by maila2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 09FD724EB32; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 07:34:36 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: Concerns about Singapore
To: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <0D914666-C3D4-4CCE-AD5E-4E5B34EA1A73@piuha.net> <20160407182936.GA21340@pfrc.org> <CAB75xn780nNDjGa_Cc222J20-+1CCHt09Xp8KHzaK=n0xx51pg@mail.gmail.com> <5706B100.9040509@mnt.se> <CAB75xn6fmj84ROUtG5eUB3GerHx83hrEr3w5vSADY_g=BRg5FA@mail.gmail.com> <5706BA40.3060005@mnt.se> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1604072157240.31096@uplift.swm.pp.se> <A9B63A6D-3102-482F-8FFC-2E57A5FD8336@nic.cz> <16925.1460122349@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <m27fg77zst.wl%randy@psg.com> <57097077.7040703@comcast.net> <m2fuuu75ls.wl%randy@psg.com> <87wpo5a8im.fsf@tops.chopps.org> <m260vp7eke.wl%randy@psg.com> <570A6458.3050206@comcast.net> <m21t6d7c9t.wl%randy@psg.com> <570A67B4.3010206@comcast.net> <570AB3AF.2050401@gmail.com> <87twj99c6w.fsf@tops.chopps.org> <CAKe6YvMyp-DyeDwpPY6KYmbDbnpgnvVk_cUStnA32wmgDWcz3w@mail.gmail.com> <BBF5DDFE515C3946BC18D733B20DAD233A62AA18@XMB122CNC.rim.net> <570B7B22.90801@cs.tcd.ie> <85DF4272E16A9292143D4AB5@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <570BB4AA.5020307@gmail.com>
From: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
Message-ID: <570BB5FC.6010405@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 10:34:36 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <570BB4AA.5020307@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/utwf0Jmb2vb9ZHFcuDzYNpXAgm8>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 14:34:46 -0000

Surprisingly to some, it turns out that it is a real help if the host 
has local people on the ground in the meeting city.  This creates a 
noticeable drawback to trying to just use 3 cities over and over.

Yours,
Joel

On 4/11/16 10:28 AM, Stewart Bryant wrote:
> I would be happy if we took a boring utilitarian
> attitude to meeting venues:
>
> Find three places that more or less work and
> just keep using them.
>
> Stewart
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email