Re: Appointment of a Transport Area Director

Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu> Tue, 05 March 2013 18:39 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@isi.edu>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3766311E80FA for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Mar 2013 10:39:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.382
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.783, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Efb77rXsU5te for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Mar 2013 10:39:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vapor.isi.edu (vapor.isi.edu [128.9.64.64]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99A6B11E80E9 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Mar 2013 10:39:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.96] (pool-71-105-87-221.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.105.87.221]) (authenticated bits=0) by vapor.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r25IcRMu001532 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 5 Mar 2013 10:38:37 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <51363BA3.6050801@isi.edu>
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2013 10:38:27 -0800
From: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130215 Thunderbird/17.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
Subject: Re: Appointment of a Transport Area Director
References: <21B86E13-B8DA-4119-BBB1-B5EE6D2B5C1D@ietf.org> <51330179.3040500@gmail.com> <919840EE-BEC8-4F82-8D3C-B116698A4262@gmx.net> <1D88E6E9-33DE-4C4D-89F4-B0B762155D6F@standardstrack.com> <D4D47BCFFE5A004F95D707546AC0D7E91F77BA46@SACEXCMBX01-PRD.hq.netapp.com> <3CB8992B-212A-4776-95FE-71CA1E382FFF@standardstrack.com> <513376DB.7000200@dcrocker.net> <E22ACC99-B465-4769-8B59-BB98A7BA93DF@gmx.net> <79E77523-3D92-4CE9-8689-483D416794EF@standardstrack.com> <D4D47BCFFE5A004F95D707546AC0D7E91F780D2F@SACEXCMBX01-PRD.hq.netapp.com> <071C6ED7-352C-4E74-A483-F5E7A3270FA5@gmail.com> <C726E531-57DC-4C42-9053-1394983126D6@vigilsec.com> <5134D5A0.4050209@gmail.com> <tsllia3m5lh.fsf@mit.edu> <5134F720.5010507@cisco.com> <tsl1ubvlywt.fsf@mit.edu> <CAHBDyN6AM-_b2HMrmmQQVuhxFc-_Rfpfg0=r38mkcJ4zqoJeTw@mail.gmail.com> <tslr4julxmh.fsf@mit.edu> <1C1C0842-BF6A-4A3F-A312-35CF0A994793@lilacglade.org> <51351E0B.5050901@dcrocker.net> <51363964.2080003@isi.edu> <51363A71.7040702@dcrocker.net>
In-Reply-To: <51363A71.7040702@dcrocker.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
Cc: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2013 18:39:51 -0000

On 3/5/2013 10:33 AM, Dave Crocker wrote:
> Joe,
>
> On 3/5/2013 10:28 AM, Joe Touch wrote:
>> On 3/4/2013 2:19 PM, Dave Crocker wrote:
>>>
>> ...
>>>       ADs do not 'lead' the work of their area.  They do not initiate
>>> the work, produce the charters or write the specifications.  Work that
>>> fails or succeeds does so because it has community consensus and demand,
>>> not because an AD was diligent or clever.  The job of an AD is to
>>> facilitate community efforts, not to direct them.
>>
>> ADs also comprise the IESG, which reviews RFCs before publication.
>>
>> We should not expect to appoint IESG members that need a tutorial on
>> basic protocol principles. Further, if the TSV AD can't stand up for
>> cong control and other TSV-specific work or TSV-specific concerns raised
>> on other drafts, then who will?
>
>
> If you can explain how your note relates to mine, I'd appreciate it.

I took your point as suggesting that an AD could get by with less 
background because they weren't leaders. In the past, ADs have either 
been people who do lead, or have led in the recent past.

If that's not your intent, I still stand by my post as relating to the 
overall thread, but apologize for any confusion.

Joe