IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Fwd: Re: [Jmap] Fwd: Re: WG Review: JSON Mail Access Protocol (jmap) - reducing configuration complexity

Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 08 February 2017 14:51 UTC

Return-Path: <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35CF1129547 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 06:51:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E2jawTSaXmBn for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 06:51:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yw0-x22f.google.com (mail-yw0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0508C1299E1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 06:51:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yw0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id l19so87136165ywc.2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 08 Feb 2017 06:51:10 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=HR/E7ku7riQvXzErhSvi/uJJDCDDoiX0kul/Fdv+oc0=; b=BIoczYed3ZL6WD0CdqQkWrLW/ieh8BH5KSCMt2YQfrmxUXRsGm7zEEAFQGMxTh+zCW R5Ffecx1GiZ1BMg2qR08bRLgwtswcXW4ySPHOPmRcB2DJbFbtml6zCdJhC4TUx41aHq1 UCBde5rOxgieRvL7UxQnnk7uE+gf7kQA9p3caOVwBIv+2kVQBgSIbbYjj6UTBvutKS9H zZShcbraZSCwTDebYPJCoU4+6msw064109dINSClo3qBbEJN2Bkhh5VadJ7MFJ5bAwbT 8/gxoFVJHNbAbpLowW23bVRiFixyjCmHo9sK/kuk2cCt0OK8SnyUwDuDOaE8mZ0814ij n+hA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=HR/E7ku7riQvXzErhSvi/uJJDCDDoiX0kul/Fdv+oc0=; b=tXzxZv84fft1xp1tAE7I86XjYYTVkw5LzPc5+lpmuWN/yhJjzFx5oN30ab84ZiO9D1 iMpG+mTTbveBJrJY/+wal4K5CikKJmYp0WMmS4sAjy93dwbhPF1FILk/WV6hCAEJp749 V38ncSrQmLt3rWegYNyGVGI7TEgql6do8bHHPIPUsGoiJWIn0zaIgLb9t9TSwqGkMhnU phjKVZZOBJ6TcJhnQcdjoh5sCfArEGUmOvIJ1zvohigmNmK+sr9e5Tis71OtYg+diaLa T8U7AubFt8pZNnZYX7auw+SjxbW1TbkMhw8KnncNp1UmzBOcGvTbDinsLuEZ0pIxiGVE Gasg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39mPiAClHHgGSSy9mCeAq9zdG3/WZWkb3c144590IQ2iP70CEe7uZLKLx2J+9U4joezyNkdy6ZIbAzqlig==
X-Received: by 10.129.162.130 with SMTP id z124mr16378170ywg.276.1486565470340; Wed, 08 Feb 2017 06:51:10 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.37.234.9 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 06:51:09 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20170208142241.GB84460@mx4.yitter.info>
References: <3b955910-12d0-2c56-0dc2-30279f98aea5@isode.com> <19fabdd7-77c5-fc13-616e-26d39d2f23df@isode.com> <20170208142241.GB84460@mx4.yitter.info>
From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2017 08:51:09 -0600
Message-ID: <CAKKJt-ftk_vXiQBhemRQqv0q4exNoE=FC1ZYi5QmrmbJXjvjmQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: [Jmap] Fwd: Re: WG Review: JSON Mail Access Protocol (jmap) - reducing configuration complexity
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c129292cbbf89054805feb7"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/v8IObGe7xFDebvCqK4NFJeVKjB0>
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2017 14:51:14 -0000

FWIW ...

On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 8:22 AM, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 01:52:00PM +0000, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
> >
> > Agreed. JMAP and IMAP are likely to co-exist for long time.
> >
>
> Isn't that exactly the complaint?  Something like, "Long periods of
> co-existence need to have lots of benefits or an existential one, or
> else they're not a good idea."


Andrew didn't point this out, but since TSVAREA has been paying attention
to it for the past couple of IETF cycles, the IAB does have
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-iab-protocol-transitions/ in active
development.

We're finding it helpful. Your mileage may vary, of course.

Spencer

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email