Re: Thanks for improved editing function over at the rfc-editor

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Tue, 22 April 2014 19:32 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 621DC1A010B for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 12:32:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hbj52BDL_Ai2 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 12:32:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-x232.google.com (mail-wg0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::232]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F47D1A003D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 12:32:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wg0-f50.google.com with SMTP id x13so4303294wgg.21 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 12:32:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=NfcIusWTsp+v5ip8akioWi0J4PcvLD3xEabS1s8U9jw=; b=kReXLEHeHhp9lLtc0MK8sE2u/dIAeWJETJNj3O7d+UInjXVbGmqgFBGef74Fu1lcg5 NJoIm5gWzlCszo8ejBDkvsgVLVrCJz5b6RyWCMN04W0mT3wO0jKy2cTdlSpYSf4yI5W2 koYbTlqaxWhCTY1EqBb4s4CP5kWxN3rBiQ00HULYhjOjNIwgj6dvMzcx35WkUBMjjklA 8/hiC6jlP830gNsw2Gyi6KOu6jWvj89J1fFUwNtsl5zaPov/Z0uEq+rOynuFZRXjtkbw lgOEnzCuaASyetjT4IqlKXxuwjmH2Dp9ar4ekwz5B5UZJcO7xK7+Zbd+nuC6z+gDln1i oRPQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.94.39 with SMTP id cz7mr220939wjb.78.1398195120084; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 12:32:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.227.144.132 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 12:32:00 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <tsloazuxlxm.fsf@mit.edu>
References: <tsloazuxlxm.fsf@mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 12:32:00 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnUk1TLPZk0T3v2CzwQX2xa8W49iK9gs66tpCJ8qSjzrxA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Thanks for improved editing function over at the rfc-editor
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/vMoOMgeR7CpFefIyqgau9Lrn_T4
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 19:32:07 -0000

On 21 April 2014 17:11, Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu> wrote:
> I see fewer documents these days, but I do see enough documents that I
> have confidence in my claim that the auth48 process seems to be much
> smoother than it used to be.

I can second that.

I recently had a (minor) technical error caught by the editor;
something I and the working group missed in several reviews.  I don't
know about improvement - I haven't seen any mistakes personally - but
the editor team is definitely doing a great job.