Re: Problem with the draft-all aliases
Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Tue, 03 January 2017 21:20 UTC
Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBC811293FF for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 13:20:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.002
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0u6hRJi3Kd5S for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 13:20:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven.nostrum.com [69.55.229.100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D40151296B4 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 13:20:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from unnumerable.local (mobile-166-173-058-100.mycingular.net [166.173.58.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id v03LKTJx012081 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=OK) for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 15:20:30 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host mobile-166-173-058-100.mycingular.net [166.173.58.100] claimed to be unnumerable.local
Subject: Re: Problem with the draft-all aliases
To: IETF general list <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <095301d26601$72b1c8a0$581559e0$@huitema.net> <C7B14253-C116-4181-8F7B-2D7CDCE80C81@dukhovni.org>
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <116d3e8a-b75a-ed55-51e5-7d81d7bcf83e@nostrum.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2017 15:20:23 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <C7B14253-C116-4181-8F7B-2D7CDCE80C81@dukhovni.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/vP3A4_9CtvOv5SPwxb8srXL-k64>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2017 21:20:33 -0000
I've also seen it and will make sure it gets in front of the right people. RjS On 1/3/17 2:54 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: >> On Jan 3, 2017, at 3:39 PM, Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net> wrote: >> >> I just copied the review directly to the authors' individual addresses, and >> they received it fine. But obviously, something is wrong in the IETF's >> guidance to reviewers, or in the implementation of these expansion lists. >> The simple "exploder" function just does not work if the sender is left to >> the original "from" address. That exploder function is not compatible with >> SPF, or presumably with DMARC. Who would be a good contact to discuss >> improvements? > IIRC Glen from AMSL reads this list, in which case the message has already > reached the right ears. As for possible remediation, if the lists are > implemented as local aliases(5) in the ietf.org Postfix server, then assigning > an "owner-" alias to the list is sufficient to avoid trouble with SPF and simple > forwarding should not break DKIM or DMARC. > > The aliases(5) file (or its database representation) would then contain > something along the lines of: > > document.all: author1@a.example, author2@b.example > owner-document.all: postmaster@ietf.org >
- Problem with the draft-all aliases Christian Huitema
- Re: Problem with the draft-all aliases Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: Problem with the draft-all aliases Robert Sparks
- RE: Problem with the draft-all aliases Adrian Farrel
- Re: Problem with the draft-all aliases Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: Problem with the draft-all aliases Glen