Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for bibliographers

Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com> Tue, 17 September 2013 01:33 UTC

Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A35E11E818A for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 18:33:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.532
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.532 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.067, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YUdzvb9nTNeM for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 18:33:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lb0-x22c.google.com (mail-lb0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::22c]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DCBE11E8187 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 18:33:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lb0-f172.google.com with SMTP id x18so4924315lbi.3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 18:33:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=QH3xN60/wfgLYgCPd9MvE+OaNgKCCedDH6kklaompFs=; b=dtx7vZnY/zHLxWglMsWGerLyVbJOOlU6yuij78hmLYIUrn+rBbMc/Dz/MO0KstKKAP 30dWXLIOZl526bZUeEU46hav4vdTq8fuOWbdtx1i4VOeUfQ4GHXKlosV2u2DkQLTglMr 6bFyRcQgHZiteu6+/vAcryV6E5Or6jAPg7mGb2XjkccNd42bE7vVpZ1D6fdRjN+y5SKR GDROb5UNcZwBcRiGqvFkFy43QIcwFcifVIk814pDWvqac7bNm4dfP/ZYmgxUUfUT9ckS 9QVc/65UEFRJ+7zhuwySjTAhAHPjX59/cvYDHuo4XJlxNYWSTbYpImFqbr7psR7X8nI5 bUFQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.8.115 with SMTP id q19mr27920131laa.16.1379381593043; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 18:33:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.148.165 with HTTP; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 18:33:12 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20130916194531.86773.qmail@joyce.lan>
References: <CAMm+Lwi3+CKd79t0=zwNbcc5bART527iuSHLuYx4bHjavTsb7g@mail.gmail.com> <20130916194531.86773.qmail@joyce.lan>
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 21:33:12 -0400
Message-ID: <CAMm+LwgGWSvpmenGQc9w0_rYgShp3wxfkBHLbjM-OhhkHt8n3w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: ORCID - unique identifiers for bibliographers
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c34f5cdcf85104e68a4d86"
Cc: IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 01:33:15 -0000

On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 3:45 PM, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> >Since this has turned out to be ambiguous, I have decided to instead use a
> >SHA-256 hash of my DNA sequence:
> >
> >9f00a4-9d1379-002a03-007184-905f6f-796534-06f9da-304b11-0f88d7-92192e-98b2
>
> How does your identical twin brother feel about this?
>

His opinion is identical to my own.


-- 
Website: http://hallambaker.com/