Re: BCP97bis
Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Sun, 17 October 2021 00:13 UTC
Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3EA33A0EE8 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 Oct 2021 17:13:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ls4p2bt5BEhb for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 Oct 2021 17:13:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x1035.google.com (mail-pj1-x1035.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1035]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21BEE3A0EDA for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 16 Oct 2021 17:13:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x1035.google.com with SMTP id qe4-20020a17090b4f8400b0019f663cfcd1so11977857pjb.1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 16 Oct 2021 17:13:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=WFjp9+CSk2ghAJEZkwjtR+Y/h2CSm+6Vg8EoHFzjII0=; b=OOvFee02UzZ0MQ9imcfJfuCG6P0MgQDak1hcDEcPLy4eUh1woV0NzYvygkNo4qpL1c e2hJ2RexjA8RnHsEYH+tSXHKZypsQKW/QOeHzrrhdlKptfULk5oxFWUt14KOgTffq4s4 KTuaYw6Up8S82NcFq7TJOIEVdls0yOG5rX0jfNI4VsRoeMTFKf1gBBMa6OSQaKa7g+ml di+Q2KifvAPXBGl2u0VlyE7QrAtkhQuos2qPtnSuNBS54utq6wv4coRaax1k5AaQHl8t mCy6Pj3pc8/NxPSm2SUBUIhB2SZtjMmvfuiG3gn8a9iLahrpmM+kEGiBdbjDSlq00Lq0 diNw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=WFjp9+CSk2ghAJEZkwjtR+Y/h2CSm+6Vg8EoHFzjII0=; b=VNw00yrFl7Q5fT5runb+hXRcFpKFRBThWRdmg82Sm8fX5FT1tvUXbD/1u3OzGdwY1A 97HCQvp2JKJzexwoxRhKInfTruQvWH1ijvlhvsKqzfyIegpMfdi/XNmOP1n1X/dTC5AI O5kxoqRzRyEsiQF5JdL2S2ctrhg6lWSCn7A72WHmw4r0H4lufpnqGZEWj7y/o7JJhxZ4 KfKsgwnB3mt3+p7Za92TGm54RB40cMm/+abt78j2qgXs3LurBQ5aOnVImxBjbS1Cwxic Uovrw3dynyn+0K1qUF//mA1sTJwjo0VasRrycfrfkMSn05Pfhj07waWO4Cnlq1mTkgKj NPsw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531hXImsBdZzSRmgY7gVdYRQW5zowP+TWz2wBgYWiY9NIC13H9kA 87vI6budk5tgxv6ZyexkQgSKcr95k5Feag==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyYevSRHsBwS7MjFy/QXbY6sherlbjfKbIQUTNzP22F51m+Iqs43h+4nAJtsxd24MmA8fyVhQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:e881:b0:13f:2a76:bbfa with SMTP id w1-20020a170902e88100b0013f2a76bbfamr18981524plg.10.1634429589045; Sat, 16 Oct 2021 17:13:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e003:102d:e801:db7:d041:a2d:ce65? ([2406:e003:102d:e801:db7:d041:a2d:ce65]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s7sm9191157pfu.139.2021.10.16.17.13.06 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 16 Oct 2021 17:13:08 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: BCP97bis
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>, Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org>, 'IETF' <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <CAL0qLwbwvs2Cp_urgJ=hzc6yEMGDaz3C0xf6RQXRrB89wAx=Rw@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwavK5dYdmYPVxdMT5rA=jBZv1cEyAsVBEWOD7p9MoZR1g@mail.gmail.com> <C657F78F-FF99-4898-8A08-844B32589DDE@vigilsec.com> <CAL0qLwbLqyWSqFGL2x-FpXXD19QG9-eZkrnTVm_fxt3tUfZSgg@mail.gmail.com> <C92D456E-63ED-453B-8F33-3AAECA40D1DA@vigilsec.com> <27721119-D39D-427D-8EEE-C5027DA15B06@akamai.com> <007c01d7c2dc$9090c780$b1b25680$@acm.org> <5385fd6f-b7a7-3baa-1374-f4d8d87216fd@joelhalpern.com> <6454.1634428177@localhost>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <6702b78c-037f-f5fd-78a6-901a999dab54@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2021 13:13:04 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6454.1634428177@localhost>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/veUk21tjy2uTINxIC4fMWu6KTFc>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2021 00:13:15 -0000
On 17-Oct-21 12:49, Michael Richardson wrote: > > Joel M. Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com> wrote: > > Just make a copy might work if we have the legal right to do so. (There are > > other complications, but they pale beside this one. In the case of IEEE > > specs that Michael Richardson has been talking about, we do NOT have a right > > to make a copy and give it away.) > > For anything that has an archive.org copy, we could use that. > > IEEE makes ure that archive.org can't archive their stuff. > If I have this right (and Scott Bradner will probably correct me if I'm wrong), the basic rules in RFC2026 section 7.1.1 recognize the reality that some open standards are essential and unavoidable references which are not available free of charge to the general public. To be clear, the phrase "open standard" in that section doesn't mean "free of charge". (Long essay on what it *does* mean elided.) (IEEE 802 and numerous CCITT Recommendations were the original problem cases, I think, and that was about hard copies, of course.) Wherever possible we try to avoid dependency on such references, but when you can't, there really isn't any choice. Brian
- BCP97bis Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: BCP97bis Russ Housley
- Re: BCP97bis Scott Bradner
- Re: BCP97bis Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: BCP97bis Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: BCP97bis David Farmer
- Re: BCP97bis Brian Carpenter
- Re: BCP97bis Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: BCP97bis Scott Bradner
- Re: BCP97bis Russ Housley
- Re: BCP97bis Salz, Rich
- Re: BCP97bis Michael Richardson
- Re: BCP97bis and Informational-as-Standard Michael Richardson
- RE: BCP97bis Larry Masinter
- Re: BCP97bis Joel M. Halpern
- Re: BCP97bis Michael Richardson
- Re: BCP97bis Brian E Carpenter
- RE: BCP97bis Larry Masinter
- Re: BCP97bis John Levine
- Re: BCP97bis Scott Bradner
- Re: BCP97bis John C Klensin
- Re: BCP97bis Carsten Bormann
- Re: BCP97bis Salz, Rich
- Re: BCP97bis John C Klensin
- Re: BCP97bis Brian E Carpenter
- Re: BCP97bis Russ Housley
- Re: BCP97bis Carsten Bormann
- Re: BCP97bis John C Klensin
- Re: BCP97bis John C Klensin
- Re: BCP97bis Carsten Bormann
- Re: BCP97bis Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: BCP97bis Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: BCP97bis Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: BCP97bis John C Klensin
- Re: BCP97bis Michael Richardson
- Re: BCP97bis John C Klensin
- Re: BCP97bis John C Klensin
- Re: BCP97bis Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: BCP97bis Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: BCP97bis Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: BCP97bis Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: BCP97bis Carsten Bormann
- Re: BCP97bis Carsten Bormann
- Re: BCP97bis tom petch
- RE: BCP97bis mohamed.boucadair
- RE: BCP97bis ned+ietf
- Re: BCP97bis John C Klensin
- BCP97bis and "freely available" John C Klensin
- RE: BCP97bis John C Klensin
- Re: BCP97bis Salz, Rich
- Re: BCP97bis John C Klensin
- Re: BCP97bis Salz, Rich
- Re: BCP97bis Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: BCP97bis Salz, Rich
- Re: BCP97bis John C Klensin
- Re: BCP97bis Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: BCP97bis Salz, Rich
- RE: BCP97bis mohamed.boucadair
- Re: BCP97bis a process problem tom petch
- Re: BCP97bis John C Klensin
- Re: BCP97bis Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: BCP97bis Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: BCP97bis Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: BCP97bis Warren Kumari
- Re: BCP97bis Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: BCP97bis Lars Eggert
- Re: BCP97bis Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: BCP97bis Warren Kumari
- Re: BCP97bis Salz, Rich
- Re: BCP97bis and "freely available" Scott O. Bradner
- Re: BCP97bis and "freely available" Brian E Carpenter
- Re: BCP97bis John C Klensin
- Re: BCP97bis and "freely available" Michael Richardson
- Re: BCP97bis and "freely available" John C Klensin
- BCP written by another AD [was Re: BCP97bis] Brian E Carpenter
- Re: BCP97bis a process problem Brian E Carpenter
- Re: BCP97bis Michael Richardson
- Re: BCP97bis and "freely available" Sandy Wills
- Re: BCP97bis and "freely available" Michael StJohns
- Re: BCP97bis and "freely available" George Michaelson
- Re: BCP97bis and "freely available" Randy Presuhn
- Re: BCP97bis and "freely available" George Michaelson
- Re: BCP97bis and "freely available" Brian E Carpenter
- Re: BCP97bis and "freely available" Salz, Rich
- Re: BCP97bis a process problem Michael Richardson
- Re: BCP97bis and "freely available" Michael Richardson
- RE: BCP97bis ned+ietf
- Re: BCP97bis a process problem Brian E Carpenter
- Re: BCP97bis and "freely available" tom petch
- Re: BCP97bis a process problem tom petch
- Re: BCP written by another AD [was Re: BCP97bis] Erik Kline
- Re: BCP97bis Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: BCP97bis Salz, Rich
- Re: BCP97bis Murray S. Kucherawy