Re: IETF must use only UTC in its announcements (Was: Live Streaming of the IETF 88 Technical Plenary

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Wed, 30 October 2013 14:05 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82F2921E80B6 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 07:05:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.971
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.971 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.664, BAYES_00=-2.599, MISSING_HEADERS=1.292, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GrxGowvBflkF for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 07:05:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [193.234.218.130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48A0721E8100 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 07:05:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB22F2CCAE for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 16:05:07 +0200 (EET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pMXPrHLcCyuu for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 16:05:07 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FAD12CC48 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 16:05:07 +0200 (EET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
Subject: Re: IETF must use only UTC in its announcements (Was: Live Streaming of the IETF 88 Technical Plenary
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <5270C66C.9070109@pi.nu>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 16:05:07 +0200
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <0800C77D-7CA2-43DA-AE7E-E6AF7C70310B@piuha.net>
References: <87879E7D-A55B-4A88-80B8-B503C89E52CB@iab.org> <20131030081355.GA23990@nic.fr> <ADB30B3C-6A91-416D-AF72-4C22A29D6C87@live555.com> <20131030083751.GB27804@nic.fr> <5270C66C.9070109@pi.nu>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 14:05:28 -0000

There is both a local participant aspect and over-the-network aspect. I think giving the times both as local times and UTC is a good idea.

We'll try to do that from now on. I have changed my blog article.

Jari