Re: Too many tools, was Things that used to be clear

Scott Kitterman <scott@kitterman.com> Sat, 13 July 2019 02:10 UTC

Return-Path: <scott@kitterman.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EE21120074 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 19:10:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (unsupported algorithm ed25519-sha256)" header.d=kitterman.com header.b=WrWtB8Sy; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kitterman.com header.b=qm6pSh6k
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9YF8gvsS7WLj for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 19:10:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from interserver.kitterman.com (interserver.kitterman.com [64.20.48.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C33E12000E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 19:10:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from interserver.kitterman.com (interserver.kitterman.com [64.20.48.66]) by interserver.kitterman.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3081BF8071F for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 22:09:50 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kitterman.com; i=@kitterman.com; q=dns/txt; s=201903e; t=1562983790; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding : content-type : from; bh=v6XjNYwIW1JRBCPg/tPoDCx9fB161bnnJZRP90WOKKc=; b=WrWtB8SyUHz+FgnPR7umJl38DVMhtsgenk/8+FaJmjeYTbPur/Ijwu8T qDW3QBSwLeI6Gxwz+1fOxn47H0x+DA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kitterman.com; i=@kitterman.com; q=dns/txt; s=201903r; t=1562983790; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding : content-type : from; bh=v6XjNYwIW1JRBCPg/tPoDCx9fB161bnnJZRP90WOKKc=; b=qm6pSh6kvsCna20Vgqy6DMLAWkEx6KtSwFX1meZNRMIiEK3YYWEOQnzK Es8GMXKuo/ZlmecYP5/S3gd2dQdvYJ6t78AV6LbRQHNTvXfzsAk4093UCF eoXCHdXjJlR/XTtWsS3aa+5r5Dn87urpEfVzN/DkvyDwWXhE5oWM/NdpK2 TCSzPBIY6kgBahy9CcVS9afe8owHRRG4SlJpQLNxXyFapHz5ElurRs923s xU3fOSq2B+MItqkuoWFExXzz1im6Bl34MnpyRiHsGot3r0L3f8g4pZcPgh AiifUtRG9HGHiNN3wPEh8E1lJrY7LtLAcHK4zETdKVLy1c1G/2cylA==
Received: from l5580.localnet (static-72-81-252-22.bltmmd.fios.verizon.net [72.81.252.22]) by interserver.kitterman.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F3490F80607 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 22:09:49 -0400 (EDT)
From: Scott Kitterman <scott@kitterman.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Too many tools, was Things that used to be clear
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 22:09:49 -0400
Message-ID: <1773930.ohg34SpTQT@l5580>
In-Reply-To: <20190713014652.B9DE64A57BC@ary.local>
References: <20190713014652.B9DE64A57BC@ary.local>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/vh261NeLpgNT_cBfc36UnE0-WeY>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2019 02:10:22 -0000

On Friday, July 12, 2019 9:46:52 PM EDT John Levine wrote:
> In article <20190710190507.GI3215@localhost> you write:
> >Yeah, it does seem lik the XML hate is mostly just that, but that our
> >use of XML is not really a blocker.  But these are feelings we're
> >talking about -- all subjective.
> 
> I think the practical difference is between a toolset that is unique
> to the IETF and one that is more widely used.
> 
> It is utterly unclear to me whether better bridge tools would help.  I
> am pretty sure that with enough effort I could write a two-way
> converter between xml2rfc and a Microsoft Word file with suitable
> stylesheets and macros.  (It'd be a lot harder than what Joe has
> done.)  So you could edit stuff in Word, and revise by importing
> xml2rfc into Word and then exporting when you're done.  But would
> anyone use it?

Certainly not those of us using operating systems for which Word is not 
relevant.

Scott K