Re: An RFC7169 use case (!)
Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu> Wed, 02 April 2014 18:42 UTC
Return-Path: <hartmans@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63B471A0383 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Apr 2014 11:42:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.235
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.235 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lgB0_cO4Ub4w for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Apr 2014 11:41:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.painless-security.com (mail.painless-security.com [23.30.188.241]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73DBE1A037B for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Apr 2014 11:41:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.painless-security.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80430206D0; Wed, 2 Apr 2014 14:41:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail.painless-security.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.suchdamage.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aUBm-ngSmJor; Wed, 2 Apr 2014 14:41:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (c-50-177-27-27.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [50.177.27.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "laptop", Issuer "laptop" (not verified)) by mail.painless-security.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Wed, 2 Apr 2014 14:41:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (Postfix, from userid 8042) id 92B1481945; Wed, 2 Apr 2014 14:41:47 -0400 (EDT)
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
To: Thierry Moreau <thierry.moreau@connotech.com>
Subject: Re: An RFC7169 use case (!)
References: <533C4624.50408@connotech.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2014 14:41:47 -0400
In-Reply-To: <533C4624.50408@connotech.com> (Thierry Moreau's message of "Wed, 02 Apr 2014 17:17:24 +0000")
Message-ID: <tsl4n2bfuac.fsf@mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/viPejIACwT-GGnwgUEY5GqZkyCA
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 03 Apr 2014 08:09:52 -0700
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2014 18:42:01 -0000
>>>>> "Thierry" == Thierry Moreau <thierry.moreau@connotech.com> writes: Thierry> It may me the first time that an April fool RFC is actually Thierry> useful. Seems UTF-9 is more useful than this.
- An RFC7169 use case (!) Thierry Moreau
- Re: An RFC7169 use case (!) Sam Hartman
- Re: An RFC7169 use case (!) Ray Bellis