Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Tue, 20 January 2015 12:51 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E31B1B2DA8 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 04:51:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B4wdvJi1x-IU for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 04:51:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFA641B2DA4 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 04:51:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.194] ([217.91.35.233]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LlE86-1Xcpt808Yg-00b6mp; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 13:51:44 +0100
Message-ID: <54BE4F5B.6050301@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 13:51:39 +0100
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps
References: <ED473823-2B1E-4431-8B42-393D20BA72DF@piuha.net> <54AC505B.8090802@nostrum.com> <8EFCB6B4-0D95-459E-A316-DB29C3945A33@cooperw.in> <DM2PR0201MB09604D5A8DBF0D315E6DA7BAC34A0@DM2PR0201MB0960.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <DM2PR0201MB09604D5A8DBF0D315E6DA7BAC34A0@DM2PR0201MB0960.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:Tx9JtTa//1zZ2XxCh2TKVESKSKnVlYY9sYHA4W6GQsGqodt7nFt BcaFIUefpJjK0K4DfXIHsXp8CTeg35diU1aoYfqUUEfYQYcouhgja2ELKhX/VBsYRwjmsB/ 7hjF4hj2RohQjekSZXpkilGAp5rZ0rO4saN9KwO75DOoTaguL4lzc12kiSaCT5pHB4FY0U5 qsfdk8Am5F/gR20z0Gzgg==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/vjmkIC7q2NQWUE5opLqWCE7VJ5o>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 12:51:49 -0000

On 2015-01-19 02:28, Larry Masinter wrote:
> In the APP, RAI, TSV area reconfiguration, a suggestion to consider:
>
> Carve out a "WEB" area which covers work that should coordinate with browsers and W3C.   Other apps (real-time or not) and transport questions could be one super-group which wouldn't be as big as all three.
>
> In Web: HTTP, URI/URL, WebRTC
> In non-Web: email, xmpp
> Could go either, but better in WEB:  MIME, encodings
>
> The idea is to improve alignment and coordination, and get more participation.
>
> Larry
> --
> http://larry.masinter.net

+1