Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Proposed Standard

"Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@cs.columbia.edu> Sun, 19 February 2006 03:32 UTC

From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@cs.columbia.edu>
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@networkresonance.com>
In-Reply-To: (Your message of "Sat, 18 Feb 2006 17:31:13 PST.") <20060219013238.779CC22241D@laser.networkresonance.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 22:32:13 -0500
Message-Id: <20060219033213.85B213C028D@berkshire.machshav.com>
Cc: iesg@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, tls@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Proposed Standard
Precedence: list
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

In message <20060219013238.779CC22241D@laser.networkresonance.com>, Eric Rescor
la writes:

>
>Since the IETF would not have change control, this is an inappropriate
>work item for the TLS WG and therefore the authors appear to have
>decided on an Individual Submission. The reason for the intended status
>of Proposed Standard 

Do we have a process issue here?  Can we have a Proposed Standard
without the IETF having change control?  (2026 speaks of change control 
only in the context of a WG.)

		--Steven M. Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Pr… Eric Rescorla
Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Pr… Steven M. Bellovin
Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Pr… Bill Fenner
Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Pr… Russ Housley
Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Pr… Russ Housley
Is round-trip time no longer a concern? (was: Re:… Dave Crocker
Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern? Russ Allbery
Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern? (was:… Steven M. Bellovin
Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Pr… Bill Strahm
Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern? (was:… Dave Cridland
Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern? Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern? Peter Dambier
RE: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Pr… Pasi.Eronen
Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern? Eric Rescorla
Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern? Keith Moore
Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern? Dave Cridland
Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern? Dave Crocker
Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern? Eric Rescorla
Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern? Tony Finch
Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern? Steven M. Bellovin
Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern? Dave Crocker
RE: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Pr… Gray, Eric
RE: [TLS] Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extens… Pasi.Eronen
Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Pr… Bernard Aboba
RE: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Pr… Russ Housley
RE: [TLS] Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extens… Russ Housley
RE: [TLS] Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extens… Stefan Santesson
RE: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Pr… Stefan Santesson
RE: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Pr… Stefan Santesson
RE: Re: [TLS] Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Ex… Stefan Santesson
RE: Re: [TLS] Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Ex… Stefan Santesson
RE: Re: [TLS] Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Ex… Russ Housley
Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Pr… Simon Josefsson
Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Pr… Jeffrey Hutzelman
RE: [TLS] Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extens… Ari Medvinsky