IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IPv10 RFC.

Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz> Wed, 16 November 2016 13:12 UTC

Return-Path: <lhotka@nic.cz>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C52CA129480 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 05:12:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.497
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.497 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nic.cz
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IaczcN5ojwSn for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 05:12:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.nic.cz (mail.nic.cz [IPv6:2001:1488:800:400::400]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 077C1129598 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 05:12:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.10.126] (unknown [211.44.215.72]) by mail.nic.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 399A761F94; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 14:12:37 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=nic.cz; s=default; t=1479301959; bh=O5f7FZFQmg/Y0ANv2hzZte3GraVb3nvE+lOm96FEGto=; h=From:Date:To; b=R3qkk/WtjffRaa2brPMAFc6uBBp4D0Aa133Bkfcg/t8h2Ub8gtq1FqW6i7ac/eAxg iJvrAew+cqpV8dKK8OIU4B83RuyCM+DFLVk0wtYxoAfrJyhw5lxO6rDHgC3nWkWLr8 04Kr4Zg6C2tcVx1Yj7BoxmvWwneeqmtLwyqFWPhU=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.1 \(3251\))
Subject: Re: IPv10 RFC.
From: Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz>
In-Reply-To: <CAJZqNqbTn=G8JqYUVqQXVBRnh_EdFHMLJrcMtAjEux0wjzZ-=Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 22:12:33 +0900
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <FBC26D35-A925-4214-B9B1-44E1AC43915D@nic.cz>
References: <HE1PR04MB1449455AEBEBA24C9B0B641BBDBE0@HE1PR04MB1449.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com> <CAJZqNqbTn=G8JqYUVqQXVBRnh_EdFHMLJrcMtAjEux0wjzZ-=Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jay Gannon <jay@thefactory21.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3251)
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.7 at mail
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/vlXVqsLbgzwXSxHzS8Y9LnuW6LU>
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org Discussion" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 13:12:42 -0000

Hi,

we have a Czech saying that goes something like this:

If somebody isn't able to accept well-intended advice, then he or she cannot be helped.

So I am wondering: isn't it time to stop responding to this thread?

Lada

> On 16 Nov 2016, at 21:28, Jay Gannon <jay@thefactory21.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Khaled
> 
> Can I recommend you please read
> 
> https://www.ietf.org/about/standards-process.html
> 
> Regards,
> 
> J
> 
> 
> On 16 Nov 2016 11:41 a.m., "Khaled Omar" <eng.khaled.omar@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Apologies if the sent text version is not having full contents.
> 
>  
> 
> Please try this version if you have difficulty with the first one.
> 
>  
> 

--
Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs
PGP Key ID: E74E8C0C

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email