Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100

<nalini.elkins@insidethestack.com> Thu, 02 February 2017 16:12 UTC

Return-Path: <nalini.elkins@insidethestack.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0DB91296EC for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Feb 2017 08:12:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.256
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.256 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-1.156, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=yahoo.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RiQwWAewEXkA for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Feb 2017 08:12:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nm37-vm8.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (nm37-vm8.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [98.136.217.44]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 594561296E3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Feb 2017 08:12:48 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1486051967; bh=Av2X3jcK5f/XztSfvnWzNgcM/Oi5ppTY2NyLfPxnLAs=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:Subject:References:From:Subject; b=kQPh9e9t0fsjd31zlvimJHniPMF/Mf0XXX5oRIM4od7j7V/qW4P8Z17iTo+zV65oaTc8u72zSvEB97h003jQYl17Z7tb/tT2awuThh7M2AekxwxZJtBbkHfSop4JZUnIUtANi0gx9F4wOjLmLsyA5PPJsLTgj8h93nVsaPwBWDT+JVedmHdGsieTvUr7W+KnlXpNO2HMLXXnmfMqswFOgfDde2NNR8spd981G1FVPoYz+fGGLtsCvjk7BjkjtuQQ29AdKsojgnSTXj7xyFeAGfDomMtr9gNvQ6PPwZUSKTRc+rxxVxomhsCfzkb67QbMp3Xhfeh4GEsOrLjLVtUSQQ==
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by nm37.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Feb 2017 16:12:47 -0000
Received: from [216.39.60.184] by nm37.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Feb 2017 16:08:44 -0000
Received: from [98.137.12.232] by tm20.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Feb 2017 16:08:44 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1040.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Feb 2017 16:08:44 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-4
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 231278.95580.bm@omp1040.mail.gq1.yahoo.com
X-YMail-OSG: eK82bHYVRDtgfAoCqOIpFuQf7CXNzbPmvwqKAF0E6WpCYH8GW8U-
Received: from jws300043.mail.gq1.yahoo.com by sendmailws110.mail.gq1.yahoo.com; Thu, 02 Feb 2017 16:08:43 +0000; 1486051723.743
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2017 16:08:43 +0000 (UTC)
From: <nalini.elkins@insidethestack.com>
To: Randal Atkinson <rja.lists@gmail.com>, Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <1550723323.3059434.1486051723341@mail.yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <1550723323.3059434.1486051723341.ref@mail.yahoo.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/vrtleV3M7U_bLO-90cUtexZy0JY>
Cc: "recentattendees@ietf.org" <recentattendees@ietf.org>, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: nalini.elkins@insidethestack.com
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2017 16:12:49 -0000

> Certainly being better placed to support remote participation will be increasingly 
> important. The IETF has made great strides in recent years with MeetEcho, etc. But no 
> doubt more can be done, and now we have an additional very good reason to do so.
 

I have just started a thread to discuss the existing drafts on remote hubs and to see what we need to do revise, throw away & start over, etc. on VMEET.   The drafts are: main, Latin America & India.

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-elkins-ietf-remote-hubs-00.html
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-oflaherty-ietf-remote-hubs-lac-00
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hegde-remote-hubs-india-01

They are very much work in progress so my feelings will not be hurt at all if we want to start over.  I am volunteering to help with any such effort.

BTW, I have put some feelers out to people about starting a Silicon Valley remote hub.  (That is my local region.)   I think it may be a good thing to have before Prague.

If anyone would like to help with a Silicon Valley hub, please contact me unicast.

Nalini