Re: Last Call: <draft-hoffman-tao4677bis-15.txt> (The Tao of IETF: A Novice's Guide to the Internet Engineering Task Force) to Informational RFC

"Bradner, Scott" <sob@harvard.edu> Fri, 08 June 2012 21:07 UTC

Return-Path: <sob@harvard.edu>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 299AB11E8194 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Jun 2012 14:07:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.289
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.289 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.310, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CYiheEzKlKRE for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Jun 2012 14:06:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ackroyd.harvard.edu (ackroyd.harvard.edu [128.103.208.29]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72F2E11E8192 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Jun 2012 14:06:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exchange.university.harvard.edu (entwedge0000001.university.harvard.edu [10.35.2.152]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ackroyd.harvard.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13A93E8C03; Fri, 8 Jun 2012 17:06:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ENTWHUBT0000006.university.harvard.edu (192.168.236.26) by ENTWEDGE0000001.university.harvard.edu (10.35.2.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.355.2; Fri, 8 Jun 2012 17:06:01 -0400
Received: from ENTWEXMB0000008.university.harvard.edu ([169.254.1.61]) by ENTWHUBT0000006.university.harvard.edu ([192.168.236.28]) with mapi id 14.01.0355.002; Fri, 8 Jun 2012 17:06:33 -0400
From: "Bradner, Scott" <sob@harvard.edu>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-hoffman-tao4677bis-15.txt> (The Tao of IETF: A Novice's Guide to the Internet Engineering Task Force) to Informational RFC
Thread-Topic: Last Call: <draft-hoffman-tao4677bis-15.txt> (The Tao of IETF: A Novice's Guide to the Internet Engineering Task Force) to Informational RFC
Thread-Index: AQHNRRPjzeDlNmma+0yP4HiwzJMosQ==
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2012 21:06:32 +0000
Message-ID: <C14F6D09-F395-4C57-98F3-EF07BDDA6112@harvard.edu>
References: <20120530225655.19475.74871.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <4FC70E09.30002@cisco.com> <91BA408B-60F6-4451-910A-7D5C33F48038@vpnc.org> <52CB44AB-006B-407F-AA44-976271B3E27E@harvard.edu> <03EE51C5-CDAB-471B-8DE2-DFB40CE1E93D@vpnc.org> <09A09092-51D1-4406-9387-5F988552BF8A@harvard.edu> <81AC4AD6-1EFC-405A-AD8F-B5AB03F2976D@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <81AC4AD6-1EFC-405A-AD8F-B5AB03F2976D@vpnc.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [173.166.5.69]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-ID: <DD1DFEFB1CEC82409EB6FC81185F54A1@Exchange.university.harvard.edu>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "<ietf@ietf.org>" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2012 21:07:00 -0000

wfm

On Jun 8, 2012, at 3:49 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote:

> On Jun 8, 2012, at 12:46 PM, Bradner, Scott wrote:
> 
>> just to be clear - saying "final appellate avenue in the standardization process". could be read as meaning
>> that a appeal of a technical decision could be made to the ISOC Board and that is not the case - 
>> this is why I used different language
>> 
>> not sure which you were supporting
> 
> 
> I am supporting not putting anything about appeals to the ISOC Board in the Tao. They do not apply to novices.
> 
> --Paul Hoffman
>