IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Telechat reviews [Re: Tooling glitch in Last Call announcements and records]

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Thu, 17 October 2024 20:47 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6468C14F609; Thu, 17 Oct 2024 13:47:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.251
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.251 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.148, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wNDQAc0xxXEZ; Thu, 17 Oct 2024 13:47:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9005:57f::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90E94C14F5FF; Thu, 17 Oct 2024 13:46:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0122330.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 49HBP28j010330; Thu, 17 Oct 2024 21:46:54 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=cc :content-id:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to; s= jan2016.eng; bh=vCuxvwqr290s9xynfp0q3qvvsxNjEOnhmXMGwcyxmjo=; b= hbvf1Fm/j4xOr1uJDsOPLS3HdaN/q3ikVHnfNmv74jUbhHz3MhBJaVjrLoWJOOp7 TutGKujSpD5hYOnKRMHM8rSrEnbVB5gr4P/t+R6giXnBklrcUKvBvb/e8+JXyHYG rSyvkE+MgaYM1PTQo2df3avlBpfFTxQMJ6WsIxqMHQQVVCSSfFxNZmR56vHE345V yMmm1A2745kW9yx1LmYtpyiVOUepEJMJdPnqMQAUuXp/NsiwJVIQbCQw8XlGxxQj JoULW7Ynn3E0PaoZIndPb31R0T6y2BxGVWmwscC3o7DyE7yDDFwFYfJsiBJABiQE MmPkyZ/YNiBtssZQ5oehTQ==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint6 (prod-mail-ppoint6.akamai.com [184.51.33.61] (may be forged)) by mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 427gs2x6u1-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 17 Oct 2024 21:46:54 +0100 (BST)
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint6.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint6.akamai.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 49HHeeoV024542; Thu, 17 Oct 2024 16:46:53 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.50.200]) by prod-mail-ppoint6.akamai.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 427mew50y6-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 17 Oct 2024 16:46:53 -0400
Received: from ustx2ex-dag4mb4.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.50.203) by ustx2ex-dag4mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.50.200) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1544.11; Thu, 17 Oct 2024 15:46:52 -0500
Received: from ustx2ex-dag4mb4.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.50.203]) by ustx2ex-dag4mb4.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.50.203]) with mapi id 15.02.1544.011; Thu, 17 Oct 2024 13:46:52 -0700
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Telechat reviews [Re: Tooling glitch in Last Call announcements and records]
Thread-Topic: Telechat reviews [Re: Tooling glitch in Last Call announcements and records]
Thread-Index: AQHbG2LWptZaoiSz/kKXCCEu/tYAzrKCVWEAgAAqF4CAAA6qAIAHQ36AgAHVR4A=
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 20:46:52 +0000
Message-ID: <B9D8CB6C-72C6-416B-A9FF-A19D1F882823@akamai.com>
References: <822159B0D390905C0A194997@PSB> <e8a0b44b-8ecf-4b24-94d4-9c79ddd26d41@amsl.com> <F3ACA29EAAC4DE9FE06EDA21@PSB> <CAL0qLwaKw8P7CGXXXHM5Hh6YvkMMqeN8OOgpv2v7Yrob5QsQ7A@mail.gmail.com> <CAC4RtVDqmcyjmbTZz3CU3zUXXtrQwfXZUS=PBhgtGK+NChhPtw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAC4RtVDqmcyjmbTZz3CU3zUXXtrQwfXZUS=PBhgtGK+NChhPtw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.90.24101387
x-originating-ip: [172.27.118.139]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <33765FCD14B25449833131A6A93D3A67@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.293,Aquarius:18.0.1051,Hydra:6.0.680,FMLib:17.12.62.30 definitions=2024-10-17_23,2024-10-17_01,2024-09-30_01
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 malwarescore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxlogscore=996 mlxscore=0 phishscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2409260000 definitions=main-2410170138
X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: bKmM4SpAfwrToqBpBJPu4uhYGLA3msRe
X-Proofpoint-GUID: bKmM4SpAfwrToqBpBJPu4uhYGLA3msRe
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.293,Aquarius:18.0.1039,Hydra:6.0.680,FMLib:17.12.60.29 definitions=2024-09-06_09,2024-09-06_01,2024-09-02_01
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlxscore=0 clxscore=1011 malwarescore=0 impostorscore=0 bulkscore=0 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxlogscore=791 suspectscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.19.0-2409260000 definitions=main-2410170139
Message-ID-Hash: CU23EB6QCAHRY7AWEMUKTHL4LGJ4RUG2
X-Message-ID-Hash: CU23EB6QCAHRY7AWEMUKTHL4LGJ4RUG2
X-MailFrom: rsalz@akamai.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-ietf.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IETF-Discussion. This is the most general IETF mailing list, intended for discussion of technical, procedural, operational, and other topics for which no dedicated mailing lists exist." <ietf.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/wCR5qhdkwYZmtZxP8ybdE84C30k>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:ietf-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ietf-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-leave@ietf.org>

> We should make it a general policy to add two weeks to the last call
>period when a document is long, for some value of "long" (I might say
> over 60 pages of substance (not counting change logs and such)).

> We decided on the two-week last call period at a different time, when
> the IETF was a different organization. Maybe we should re-think it
> now, and keep in mind that an extra two weeks of last-call review is
> *not* going to be the most significant delay in a document's life
> cycle.

RFC 2026 in Section 6.1.2 says "at least two weeks". This language is preserved in the 2026bis document[1]. I guess the IESG can just make a rule and promulgate it.


[1] https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-rsalz-2026bis-12.html#section-8.1.1-1

v2.28.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status