Re: Hotel situation
<l.wood@surrey.ac.uk> Tue, 05 January 2016 12:39 UTC
Return-Path: <l.wood@surrey.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9936E1B2D43 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 04:39:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q21a4NvkN6RN for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 04:39:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail1.bemta5.messagelabs.com (mail1.bemta5.messagelabs.com [195.245.231.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9112B1B2D3B for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 04:39:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [195.245.231.67] by server-4.bemta-5.messagelabs.com id 5B/EE-24856-289BB865; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 12:39:30 +0000
X-Env-Sender: l.wood@surrey.ac.uk
X-Msg-Ref: server-5.tower-82.messagelabs.com!1451997569!6935700!2
X-Originating-IP: [131.227.200.39]
X-StarScan-Received:
X-StarScan-Version: 7.35.1; banners=-,-,-
X-VirusChecked: Checked
Received: (qmail 3141 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2016 12:39:30 -0000
Received: from exht012p.surrey.ac.uk (HELO EXHT012P.surrey.ac.uk) (131.227.200.39) by server-5.tower-82.messagelabs.com with AES128-SHA encrypted SMTP; 5 Jan 2016 12:39:30 -0000
Received: from EXHY022V.surrey.ac.uk (131.227.201.104) by EXHT012P.surrey.ac.uk (131.227.200.39) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.348.2; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 12:39:28 +0000
Received: from emea01-db3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (131.227.201.241) by EXHY022v.surrey.ac.uk (131.227.201.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.224.2; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 12:39:28 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=surreyac.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-surrey-ac-uk; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=0NGqVjWIfRdvN7G4Q1XJBqgGcmQ2PPvYNvkARdjfCg0=; b=Qbpvg0t9HKTAfg8ONK1adaQVhkG2WZlOAVKuCKu8WXFLDgO7fxePFz9rebRv6LsSNpwm/kfG7BE6ZF18vtpynhcsKwTwQR9GQhEtMuJDPwqdIjZfzzd39BaN1PNH7JZ6HIcvkDH9xzgT1kVh2D7nA2OOue3BHdn6Z8hzOHscT/I=
Received: from DB4PR06MB457.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.141.238.15) by DB4PR06MB459.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.141.238.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.361.13; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 12:39:27 +0000
Received: from DB4PR06MB457.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.238.15]) by DB4PR06MB457.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.238.15]) with mapi id 15.01.0361.006; Tue, 5 Jan 2016 12:39:28 +0000
From: l.wood@surrey.ac.uk
To: jari.arkko@piuha.net, stewart.bryant@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Hotel situation
Thread-Topic: Hotel situation
Thread-Index: AQHROB/2w7vZpSEp/EecLIgUwA8c557N1AYAgB3YjQCAABxpgIAANgEAgADEDoCAACwxgIAAC1rQ
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 12:39:28 +0000
Message-ID: <DB4PR06MB457CC91FC9BCF4B69081699ADF30@DB4PR06MB457.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>
References: <567192F3.9090506@gmail.com> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B630797A09BC1@mbx-03.WIN.NOMINUM.COM> <48E1A67CB9CA044EADFEAB87D814BFF6449900E0@eusaamb107.ericsson.se> <CABmDk8n2TFvmoMVa8t3FOGXtKF9GUii=wrEyMpJucAoLzCix1Q@mail.gmail.com> <D38CB535C27A8E9D7B77BC2F@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <568B89BD.1040008@gmail.com>, <BEF21E7D-E7FB-40E5-A149-80D40B6B0075@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <BEF21E7D-E7FB-40E5-A149-80D40B6B0075@piuha.net>
Accept-Language: en-AU, en-US
Content-Language: en-AU
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [203.214.159.116]
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; DB4PR06MB459; 5:rg8uXVb5H7LlANP3wgAvYfXr7qdkyl+vmPJsm4SQmZ8eJr1YEb/bpYQTpASvI4jaryLWOWhAr11VSBx985AbkcL0OtS5gUvYPk7m8aDiB+1A02IeBe4hW94xrPYyIuJcpoZMOgCOcvtwoiPBmxTaUQ==; 24:eMk7dIj7KGuWwA6y4F3b+QngwwqYoqwat9mpjRH9FYVIwBnAQCdEQqUX0q0inTpvX6jecTXuggoL1N8ZGt1HginnhtpkSDokMYNLmVwU89U=
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:DB4PR06MB459;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DB4PR06MB459B4D34D86139C5470AB96ADF30@DB4PR06MB459.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(2401047)(520078)(8121501046)(5005006)(10201501046)(3002001); SRVR:DB4PR06MB459; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:DB4PR06MB459;
x-forefront-prvs: 0812095267
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(199003)(377424004)(377454003)(189002)(77096005)(87936001)(106356001)(40100003)(102836003)(92566002)(76176999)(2950100001)(74482002)(50986999)(5008740100001)(5001770100001)(5002640100001)(86362001)(2900100001)(189998001)(81156007)(54356999)(4326007)(97736004)(106116001)(74316001)(5004730100002)(6116002)(5003600100002)(66066001)(105586002)(221733001)(3846002)(5001960100002)(76576001)(33656002)(19580405001)(1096002)(586003)(1220700001)(101416001)(19580395003)(122556002)(10400500002)(93886004); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:DB4PR06MB459; H:DB4PR06MB457.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: surrey.ac.uk does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 05 Jan 2016 12:39:28.0116 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 6b902693-1074-40aa-9e21-d89446a2ebb5
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DB4PR06MB459
X-OrganizationHeadersPreserved: DB4PR06MB459.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com
X-CrossPremisesHeadersFiltered: EXHY022v.surrey.ac.uk
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/wEEfaEa0SSaVrmwMAesy7LFFMX0>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 12:39:34 -0000
I remain disappointed that the concepts of Minneapolis, and MPLS, have not been extended to calling them 'mipples.' Are we going to Mipples? again? Is our network infrastructure mipples-enabled? Should we implement a bogop mipples vippen? L. sometimes a metaphor is just a metaphor. ________________________________________ From: ietf <ietf-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Sent: Tuesday, 5 January 2016 10:53:51 PM To: Stewart Bryant Cc: IETF Discussion Subject: Re: Hotel situation > Minneapolis is really a metaphor for functional, works well for most > people, easy to get flights and hotels, flight times not too bad, not regarded > as a holiday trip at work, everyone is there to work. Yes. And I think we have several conceptual Minneapolises :-) some of which we are returning to. > It does not have to be Minneapolis, but the utilitarian properties above, > are in my view far more relevant than the IETF World Tour model we > seem to have in place. Our main criteria is 1-1-1*, and I agree that we can get some further efficiencies by focusing more on repeat locations with good experience. But we will still need to meet in different parts of the world. Granted, two out of the last 15 meetings were in touristy locations - that’s still probably less than, say corresponding fraction in some other organisations such as the IEEE. In any case, for me the main criteria is ease of travel (flights), availability of a range of hotels (and the hotel block in main ones), and ability to put the IETF network in and other practical issues. Jari
- Hotel situation Melinda Shore
- RE: Hotel situation Ted Lemon
- Re: Hotel situation Jared Mauch
- Re: Hotel situation Melinda Shore
- Re: Hotel situation Tim Wicinski
- RE: Hotel situation Ted Lemon
- Re: Hotel situation Melinda Shore
- Re: Hotel situation Dave Crocker
- Re: Hotel situation Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: Hotel situation Eggert, Lars
- Re: Hotel situation Ole Jacobsen
- Re: Hotel situation Nadeau Thomas
- Re: Hotel situation Paul Wouters
- Re: Hotel situation John Levine
- Re: Hotel situation John Levine
- Re: Hotel situation Paul Wouters
- Re: Hotel situation Deen, Glenn (NBCUniversal)
- Re: Hotel situation Lou Berger
- Re: Hotel situation Melinda Shore
- Re: Hotel situation Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Hotel situation Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Hotel situation Melinda Shore
- Re: Hotel situation John R Levine
- Re: Hotel situation Toerless Eckert
- Re: Hotel situation Sarah Banks
- Re: Hotel situation Donald Eastlake
- Re: Hotel situation Livingood, Jason
- Re: Hotel situation John Levine
- Re: Hotel situation Livingood, Jason
- Re: Hotel situation Andrew Sullivan
- Re: Hotel situation Sarah Banks
- Re: Hotel situation Tim Chown
- Re: Hotel situation Ray Pelletier
- Re: Hotel situation Brian Rosen
- Re: Hotel situation Deen, Glenn (NBCUniversal)
- Re: Hotel situation Christian Hopps
- Re: Hotel situation John Levine
- Re: Hotel situation John Levine
- Re: Hotel situation Fernando Gont
- Re: Hotel situation Fernando Gont
- Re: Hotel situation Tim Chown
- Re: Hotel situation Jari Arkko
- Re: Hotel situation Toerless Eckert
- Re: Hotel situation Jari Arkko
- Re: Hotel situation Jared Mauch
- Re: Hotel situation Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: Hotel situation Warren Kumari
- Re: Hotel situation Eggert, Lars
- Re: Hotel situation Leif Johansson
- Re: Hotel situation Tim Chown
- Re: Hotel situation Brian Rosen
- Re: Hotel situation Toerless Eckert
- Re: Hotel situation Stewart Bryant
- Re: Hotel situation Warren Kumari
- Re: Hotel situation Melinda Shore
- Re: Hotel situation Warren Kumari
- Re: Hotel situation Michal Krsek
- Re: Hotel situation Warren Kumari
- Re: Hotel situation Dave Crocker
- Venue Selection Objectives and Criteria was Re: H… Ray Pelletier
- Meeting rotation (was Hotel situation) Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: Meeting rotation (was Hotel situation) Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: Meeting rotation (was Hotel situation) Carsten Bormann
- Re: Meeting rotation (was Hotel situation) Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Meeting rotation (was Hotel situation) Michal Krsek
- Re: Meeting rotation (was Hotel situation) Andrew G. Malis
- Re: Meeting rotation (was Hotel situation) Andrew Sullivan
- Cross-area review (was Meeting rotation) Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Cross-area review (was Meeting rotation) Andrew Sullivan
- Re: Meeting rotation (was Hotel situation) Wassim Haddad
- Re: Meeting rotation (was Hotel situation) Richard Shockey
- Re: Meeting rotation (was Hotel situation) tom p.
- Re: Meeting rotation (was Hotel situation) Jari Arkko
- Re: Meeting rotation (was Hotel situation) John Levine
- Re: Meeting rotation (was Hotel situation) Stephen Farrell
- Re: Cross-area review (was Meeting rotation) Jari Arkko
- Re: Meeting rotation (was Hotel situation) John C Klensin
- Re: Cross-area review (was Meeting rotation) Dave Crocker
- RE: Hotel situation Randall Gellens
- Re: Cross-area review (was Meeting rotation) Ralph Droms
- Re: Cross-area review (was Meeting rotation) Dave Crocker
- Re: Cross-area review (was Meeting rotation) John C Klensin
- Re: Cross-area review (was Meeting rotation) Dave Crocker
- Re: Cross-area review (was Meeting rotation) John C Klensin
- Re: Cross-area review (was Meeting rotation) Jari Arkko
- Re: Cross-area review (was Meeting rotation) Jari Arkko
- Re: Cross-area review (was Meeting rotation) Eric Burger
- Re: Cross-area review (was Meeting rotation) tom p.
- Re: Cross-area review (was Meeting rotation) Dave Crocker
- Re: Cross-area review (was Meeting rotation) Brian E Carpenter
- RE: Hotel situation Pat (Patricia) Thaler
- RE: Cross-area review (was Meeting rotation) Ted Lemon
- Re: Cross-area review (was Meeting rotation) Eric Burger
- Re: Cross-area review (was Meeting rotation) Dave Crocker
- Re: Cross-area review (was Meeting rotation) Joel M. Halpern
- InterContinental BA experience so far (was: Re: H… Marco Davids
- Re: Cross-area review (was Meeting rotation) Keith Moore
- Re: InterContinental BA experience so far (was: R… John Levine
- Re: InterContinental BA experience so far (was: R… Melinda Shore
- Re: InterContinental BA experience so far (was: R… John Levine
- Re: InterContinental BA experience so far (was: R… Fernando Gont
- RE: Cross-area review (was Meeting rotation) Ted Lemon
- Re: Cross-area review (was Meeting rotation) Brian E Carpenter
- RE: Cross-area review (was Meeting rotation) Ted Lemon
- Re: Cross-area review (was Meeting rotation) Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Cross-area review (was Meeting rotation) Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: Cross-area review (was Meeting rotation) Keith Moore
- Re: Cross-area review (was Meeting rotation) Dave Crocker
- Payouts for missed blocks (was Re: Hotel situatio… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: Payouts for missed blocks (was Re: Hotel situ… John C Klensin
- Re: Payouts for missed blocks (was Re: Hotel situ… Theodore Ts'o
- Independent Stream (was Re: Cross-area review (wa… Dave Crocker
- RE: Hotel situation Eric Gray
- Re: Hotel situation Mary Barnes
- Re: Hotel situation John Levine
- Re: Hotel situation Jari Arkko
- Re: Hotel situation John C Klensin
- Re: Hotel situation Stewart Bryant
- Re: Hotel situation Jari Arkko
- Re: Hotel situation l.wood
- Re: Hotel situation Christian Hopps
- Re: Hotel situation John C Klensin
- Re: Hotel situation Dave Crocker
- Re: Hotel situation Tim Chown
- Re: Hotel situation John C Klensin
- Re: Venue Selection Objectives and Criteria was R… George, Wes
- Re: Hotel situation John C Klensin
- Re: Hotel situation Nadeau Thomas
- Re: Hotel situation Ole Jacobsen
- Re: Hotel situation Jared Mauch
- Venue Data for Upcoming Meetings was Re: Hotel si… Ray Pelletier
- Re: Hotel situation tom p.
- Re: Hotel situation Bob Hinden
- Re: Hotel situation Randy Bush
- Re: Hotel situation Paul Wouters
- Re: Hotel situation Richard Shockey
- Re: Hotel situation Randy Bush
- Re: Hotel situation Ole Jacobsen
- Re: Hotel situation lloyd.wood
- Re: locations, was Hotel situation John Levine
- Re: locations, was Hotel situation lloyd.wood
- Re: Hotel situation Randall Gellens
- "resource-rich urban environments" (was "Re: Hote… Randall Gellens
- Re: Hotel situation Randall Gellens
- Re: Hotel situation Randall Gellens
- Re: Hotel situation Randall Gellens
- Re: not really the current Hotel situation John Levine
- Re: Hotel situation Lloyd Wood
- Re: Hotel situation Randall Gellens
- Re: Hotel situation Toerless Eckert
- Re: Hotel situation John C Klensin
- Re: Hotel situation Ole Jacobsen
- Re: ever more hypothetical Hotel situation John Levine
- RE: ever more hypothetical Hotel situation Christer Holmberg
- Re: ever more hypothetical Hotel situation Theodore V Faber
- Re: Venue Data for Upcoming Meetings was Re: Hote… Ray Pelletier