Re: NomCom eligibility & IETF 107

Michael StJohns <mstjohns@comcast.net> Thu, 26 March 2020 18:08 UTC

Return-Path: <mstjohns@comcast.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 246513A0C3A for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 11:08:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=comcast.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1FV_Jtzg6Asf for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 11:08:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from resdmta-ch2-01v.sys.comcast.net (resdmta-ch2-01v.sys.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 702593A0BFB for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 11:08:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from resqmta-ch2-04v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.36]) by resqmta-ch2-12v.sys.comcast.net with ESMTP id HVpgjO5R47LGVHWvyjokn2; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 18:08:50 +0000
Received: from resomta-ch2-10v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.106]) by resqmta-ch2-04v.sys.comcast.net with ESMTP id HW4BjouxssAwiHWvxjyobK; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 18:08:49 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=20190202a; t=1585246129; bh=w2R3Jws6G9IktpXQXmd13bfcLGQD7wZeA18kiotZ/QY=; h=Received:Received:Subject:To:From:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=NTDa3yv6Syy7HPgHvb+gcoprR5NZgQvs/zuJDnJbISlYausf7szHOCYZJGpABkEkJ PqtejMBnl9d+/1DWrU7ZhuYAMW74xSnhZ2NdWOsg8K9g+6Z6wtRpIjyTrhCiHWOJja /Y66KWb+Cbd4IPnTuoI6KqFcz3hr3zVum5QX9S6KWc2oajI2H2m7z/Q2ZsOvRCnnMm P7A97yspHXvpOrYeYect0/0ZqpK3lpcUQOiohQhPwFDnRIfv1kq+4Ieuoe3y7cHf8O WWOjKPzmounqhLhkVRue9DgixE3w6wHwM0rkPY6GweXJ4Wt/0vTnS8myzSve58eLQE a4Ll0plfuEl9g==
Received: from [192.168.1.115] ([71.163.188.115]) by resomta-ch2-10v.sys.comcast.net with ESMTPSA id HWvFjx0UUg6zoHWvcjaC4y; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 18:08:32 +0000
X-Xfinity-VAAS: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedugedrudehjedggeehucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuvehomhgtrghsthdqtfgvshhipdfqfgfvpdfpqffurfetoffkrfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefuvfhfhffkffgfgggjtgfgsehtkeertddtfeejnecuhfhrohhmpefoihgthhgrvghlucfuthflohhhnhhsuceomhhsthhjohhhnhhssegtohhmtggrshhtrdhnvghtqeenucfkphepjedurdduieefrddukeekrdduudehnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehhvghloheplgduledvrdduieekrddurdduudehngdpihhnvghtpeejuddrudeifedrudekkedrudduhedpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehmshhtjhhohhhnshestghomhgtrghsthdrnhgvthdprhgtphhtthhopehivghtfhesihgvthhfrdhorhhg
X-Xfinity-VMeta: sc=0.00;st=legit
Subject: Re: NomCom eligibility & IETF 107
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <CALaySJ+kFVXrVAkYLaO6MaPqDA29MzXhVFcxG0c6hZcBs-LqnQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAC4RtVAhfFLYwzqw6Qch3BpuMvqjZPzFJ5o1iTOwR+yqH8j-Aw@mail.gmail.com> <55D8F3C6-7F2A-4382-AFFD-B8A1D7C14992@akamai.com> <28066.1585242203@localhost> <2118E3F9-03DE-4663-B648-7BC95AFEDFC1@akamai.com>
From: Michael StJohns <mstjohns@comcast.net>
Message-ID: <2d332d21-a4a4-d0d4-d8c4-8dde426d0f24@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2020 14:08:04 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <2118E3F9-03DE-4663-B648-7BC95AFEDFC1@akamai.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/wGtwGatuxgJMJ0ZyPxvDWamzM0s>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2020 18:08:53 -0000

On 3/26/2020 1:54 PM, Salz, Rich wrote:
>>    I didn't understand your words, but subsequent emails make me think you are
>      saying:
>              107 occured.
>              People who signed bluesheets on more than one day attended.
>    
> Mostly.  I want to get the largest pool of candidates.
>
> So 107 is a Heisenberg meeting.
> 	People who signed the etherpad on more than one day get to count 107 in 3 of 5.
you mean 3 of 6 I believe.
> 	People who did not, get counted from 102-106 for their 3 of 5.
>
> I realize that defining a Heisenmeeting would probably make some people uncomfortable.  But I view it as just accepting the reality.
>    
>   
>
It would be interesting to see what the difference in the lists of 
eligible persons would be between the 106 - 3 of 5 and 107 - 3 of 6 
approaches.  I'm actually thinking maybe not more than 5-10 people.  
Then xref that with the volunteers lists for the last 3 nomcoms to see 
if any of the 5-10 actually volunteered.

Mike