Re: Hotel networks (Was Re: Security for the IETF wireless network)

Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com> Fri, 01 August 2014 05:36 UTC

Return-Path: <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EF941A03E4 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 22:36:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RnUAx-zFFkgB for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 22:36:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pd0-x232.google.com (mail-pd0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F1281A01E0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 22:36:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pd0-f178.google.com with SMTP id w10so4827583pde.37 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 22:36:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=q+pXJICbo2dWHu8/NCw6L+TrR9gsMDvRXWwqCl1F07E=; b=RoSGb6zAW26Q1fKitDe1gid8pJKT0KBiCqTtL7MhTI1kou31YjqqJEGKFyJQgGw2m8 2ULQkdKMhEENdViWsT6ONe5Z2auK6e3G4UYi+ziF9Z5Po9kHIKzAxD4dnaUobTII48eo F+3sloERQGTAUnkJhk328zjuanfuSbZ1Fzu8lXg70lSMXlbLPjaTWMTraC2rd44YYX3Y H4IOY6XSKE0oC9nJyjxzVKndQ2BjiLFLVBxUfIQFK2gCEwrTUlq9Oc/oX4A/9H4knmea /HuqHtv04HI9/ly9taNsavAvE61UDfdIUS7Pu0liGsJSOBSILHImhl7QPv8qeWWCH46e 1+Tw==
X-Received: by 10.66.252.134 with SMTP id zs6mr3210801pac.40.1406871380224; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 22:36:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from spandex.local (63-140-93-212.dynamic.dsl.acsalaska.net. [63.140.93.212]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ml5sm26474091pab.10.2014.07.31.22.36.18 for <ietf@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 31 Jul 2014 22:36:19 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <53DB274F.4020405@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 21:36:15 -0800
From: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Hotel networks (Was Re: Security for the IETF wireless network)
References: <0FE63216-9BE8-450F-80FB-D1DB6166DFEF@ietf.org> <CFF7BBD1.28A2F%wesley.george@twcable.com> <8B1DA3E3-F195-4CBC-B565-85CAFC31CB1B@shinkuro.com> <3708BC187C6387C727398CBB@JCK-EEE10> <53D25E42.1010903@bogus.com> <F4A7C1707FF74B85D3F921CC@JCK-EEE10> <p06240605d000cb162b5b@[99.111.97.136]>
In-Reply-To: <p06240605d000cb162b5b@[99.111.97.136]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/wI2ry93GxACyZgTerzW1r21dGx4
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2014 05:36:23 -0000

On 7/31/14 8:45 PM, Randall Gellens wrote:
> Seems like a step in the right direction.  Of course, speed during a few
> samples isn't the complete picture, but it's better than nothing.
> Perhaps IETFers can help the site measure other factors?

I'm good with requiring hotels to have proper hot water kettles in
guest rooms.  That was excellent.

I'm a little surprised to hear that people are using that sort of
bandwidth at meetings.  I do think it would be useful to know what
sort of content filtering, etc (if any) hotels are doing on their
guest networks.

Melinda