Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Mon, 04 November 2019 21:13 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEDE3120106 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 13:13:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tKmgTrbL3Jut; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 13:13:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9001:583::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CCE5120096; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 13:13:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050095.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050095.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id xA4L1sMd002374; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 21:13:55 GMT
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=SywBt6XfBTfEzmCFCYf5onp//+l90cuXguRKZwmByfk=; b=A5Xr4DFLq6ddzwpvgHnMtrFOl70fJdVYGBTfMjV9DIBbeLiXpMBYRczbhmZfn+mObXSo /DS5N8j71ONC+P+hg7UuCEg3ZK0crc0Q5zklLmHyWLB73PLg++HxcsTis6mvkJN4QdKn yqU35a/zsC52jMyVNON4bym+r+gynFzgHbvX9SZdbIYgzgu7jk7Fi4tFqoVrOuEzw5XC mJwma6a/25TH13dXxKLMpN4EoEfoiOrRtuhH0fnH5zfSSnRJ/E3xVs2+XfPacGZVJJ1J QuKslYqj1zU1aeLNpmXHp31GbxZqjvxx9guhVjbWYrgpVgfFR/wKpN57Er+B4RJZYlOU zA==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint2 (prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com [184.51.33.19] (may be forged)) by m0050095.ppops.net-00190b01. with ESMTP id 2w1278auk3-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 04 Nov 2019 21:13:54 +0000
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id xA4L2Jkt001779; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 16:13:53 -0500
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.30]) by prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2w154wj57m-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 04 Nov 2019 16:13:53 -0500
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB3.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.103) by usma1ex-dag1mb2.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.102) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 16:13:52 -0500
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB3.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.103]) by usma1ex-dag1mb3.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.103]) with mapi id 15.00.1473.005; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 16:13:52 -0500
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
CC: "nomcom-chair-2019@ietf.org" <nomcom-chair-2019@ietf.org>, ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback
Thread-Topic: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback
Thread-Index: AQHVkllZtlByHExQzkS7nb/noDw4vqd7Ei2AgABDYACAAAVVgIAAZu0A//+s7wCAAGh5gP//rZoA
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2019 21:13:52 +0000
Message-ID: <688676A8-5A62-406D-A164-FF03A5FDC97B@akamai.com>
References: <157279399807.13506.13363770981495597049.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <0EF64763-BA25-468A-B387-91445A61D318@gmail.com> <CAJU8_nUovmFmgNiYx0ez_1f+GPdU9xGViDYWfowEEomrn0pyDw@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1911040841160.27600@bofh.nohats.ca> <CE06CC6D-E37F-4C90-B782-D14B1D715D4B@cable.comcast.com> <38E47448-63B4-4A5D-8A9D-3AB890EBDDDD@akamai.com> <9D0E5D44-552D-4F07-A53E-AFC4B9B733E2@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <9D0E5D44-552D-4F07-A53E-AFC4B9B733E2@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.1e.0.191013
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.37.132]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <85906E6F36810E43AEF3D7701F46440F@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-11-04_11:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=990 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1908290000 definitions=main-1911040203
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.95,1.0.8 definitions=2019-11-04_11:2019-11-04,2019-11-04 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 suspectscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 clxscore=1015 mlxlogscore=976 impostorscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 bulkscore=0 malwarescore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-1908290000 definitions=main-1911040203
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/wJ5pMi34neSl4wZjA9ipa_YOvTk>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2019 21:13:57 -0000

    > I wonder what people think would break if we moved to 5 AD's per area, and they could divide the WG's and IESG concalls amongst themselves?
    > 
    
> But the ADs will still have to attend all three meetings plus the retrieat, and most of them are still going to be reading every draft.

I would hope that is no longer necessary.