Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis

Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com> Wed, 18 June 2008 21:26 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92AC03A6B6F; Wed, 18 Jun 2008 14:26:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F3333A6B5E; Wed, 18 Jun 2008 14:26:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ggdhk-qW2JDj; Wed, 18 Jun 2008 14:26:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-1.cisco.com (sj-iport-1.cisco.com [171.71.176.70]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FA793A6914; Wed, 18 Jun 2008 14:26:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.27,667,1204531200"; d="scan'208";a="42363227"
Received: from sj-dkim-1.cisco.com ([171.71.179.21]) by sj-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 18 Jun 2008 14:27:47 -0700
Received: from sj-core-5.cisco.com (sj-core-5.cisco.com [171.71.177.238]) by sj-dkim-1.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m5ILRlF8018728; Wed, 18 Jun 2008 14:27:47 -0700
Received: from xbh-sjc-221.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-221.cisco.com [128.107.191.63]) by sj-core-5.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m5ILRlCD022682; Wed, 18 Jun 2008 21:27:47 GMT
Received: from xfe-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com ([171.70.151.174]) by xbh-sjc-221.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 18 Jun 2008 14:27:47 -0700
Received: from tky-kokawaka-871-tu0.cisco.com ([10.21.78.182]) by xfe-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 18 Jun 2008 14:27:47 -0700
Message-Id: <1E25AA8B-D143-4B35-8B41-B707EFA9CB8E@cisco.com>
From: Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com>
To: bob.hinden@nokia.com
In-Reply-To: <C122F91B-59B0-49AC-ABBC-6752217C4E47@NOKIA.COM>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v924)
Subject: Re: Appeal against IESG blocking DISCUSS on draft-klensin-rfc2821bis
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 17:27:46 -0400
References: <8832006D4D21836CBE6DB469@klensin-asus.vbn.inter-touch.net> <485590E2.3080107@gmail.com> <p06250116c47c330c7dd0@[75.145.176.242]> <4856DE3A.3090804@gmail.com> <C122F91B-59B0-49AC-ABBC-6752217C4E47@NOKIA.COM>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.924)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Jun 2008 21:27:47.0224 (UTC) FILETIME=[27213980:01C8D18A]
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=900; t=1213824467; x=1214688467; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim1004; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=rdroms@cisco.com; z=From:=20Ralph=20Droms=20<rdroms@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20Appeal=20against=20IESG=20blocking=20DI SCUSS=20on=20draft-klensin-rfc2821bis=20 |Sender:=20; bh=sjcdKM6yWCRsnMGa6SD0ZmU4rOto0aN8xUS68A6lP44=; b=UulmkIIcCLvyISE/37GrJOCJLqc5ngAS4SjON+6EuDN097vNVNzlrHVT5c SOKl+qKswt/laG7QaEHUDEMSVS7G4BMGk23BgYHjEQw45nHHaFEZ78Rx6eL9 joI+4qX+3wRKxfKywSs3coOr5mGy2/NyrS4thfgLYQrF/5r4WwtG0=;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-1; header.From=rdroms@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim1004 verified; );
Cc: IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

No, you're not the only one seeing insanity.

- Ralph

On Jun 18, 2008, at Jun 18, 2008,12:44 PM, Bob Hinden wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Let me see if I understand this.
>
> - This is the specification for SMTP.  It's was first used on the
> Arpanet.
>
> - It is probably as widely deployed as IP and TCP.  Maybe more so.
>
> - It works (e.g., the email discussing this thread was sent via SMTP).
>
> - The IETF is now advancing it to Draft Standard.  I assume this means
> that we now have enough implementation experience.
>
> - Now the IESG doesn't want to approve it for Draft Standard because
> it is using a different set of example domains instead of the official
> IETF ones.
>
> Am I the only one who sees the insanity here?
>
> Bob
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> IETF mailing list
> IETF@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf