L3 RFC draft help

Aqua Q Glass <aquaqglass@gmail.com> Tue, 20 April 2021 18:29 UTC

Return-Path: <aquaqglass@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EE0C3A10A7 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 11:29:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mVGrE890yDOd for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 11:29:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot1-x336.google.com (mail-ot1-x336.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::336]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20D343A10F1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 11:29:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot1-x336.google.com with SMTP id g4-20020a9d6b040000b029029debbbb3ecso3685149otp.7 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 11:29:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version:date:subject:message-id :to; bh=bRfU6klPerl7pCYCjtqPiiUVdajfyOzzg6+FuvPeJMA=; b=WOSE3oem+m0hXi9rhxbrHVNRWPyIg/5rbBURIZWJV9bF3hQmia9/p+P9HSjljmJ1L6 t47ZgRPFCtLN2RXrz8kEfasoDCGhrVejmyRzLeRrQAXVCp20jLQLpxo2tCTitQnik9JX 5QAD+bmlPVYyA5lViWxdacwpMfFc+x5DQqm42PVt2mVYdWq+lgxjrF/Fa8FRQ2ari9kg kZE1Pp23hvUOw+4IcrLF41Ggdd+mvEPWBTmUxKQsE/vKHg8fCoBTfFMT+aApmBEJoaAr 3UJQVbbbFUa1PRAHEfbcyXFzZU/x1FOiyW3ZJ3Qu7Hq5bGD21OmbCFcXaiDB11Tcqc2P 515A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version:date :subject:message-id:to; bh=bRfU6klPerl7pCYCjtqPiiUVdajfyOzzg6+FuvPeJMA=; b=UZsvwxrB79f7eh8nX1Bkv51aNypcW95ZqK2pA0UWSUkknb2NO/PonQhAoxPG88b2mf k1HNBeA6nUVVsXFQfoZsjFYpRQDMS4od4sAy9+vTz8JPySeFQS2UO/FLOLNpxk8JNSmc 9kUoWU8bkX4Hzuv4DHbs9+EdHqTHO5wKht0iBagGbHO2YLk+aC5WQFqIWT1zvMd2KQct VOiObwje71vOkRjcokP8vrgslUfUPE0LP9lM2hr44OkXWqjY8QvdhWTmfbX4oD/r4Tdm 3vxgjongxlKi9LZex0Z0X6Us5iLjQzZamulI6jLuyo3WtRq2wgfYbG3L1E9jq82dbxvp 6Bcg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531wHCqdt5KzHjKnHd9AOlO5UF5xaNDura7VFqssWOXTu/VzpCh0 p40xF8XWWW4ZnJB5ey+YscZ2kxu/Bg1lFg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy8ceJquzi96H/WYhWpD5MKAkBaYgogB1rphnKUMmOmOdNeUDXCWMuUMvQPs6PLo7eNIJX6MA==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:1f12:: with SMTP id u18mr13293563otg.132.1618943390170; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 11:29:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2600:1700:2f74:1a10:28e2:2d63:10ab:65d8? ([2600:1700:2f74:1a10:28e2:2d63:10ab:65d8]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 93sm2951172otr.31.2021.04.20.11.29.48 for <ietf@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 20 Apr 2021 11:29:48 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=Apple-Mail-4F1B8049-DE3A-4DC7-88FE-0ABDACEA42F7
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Aqua Q Glass <aquaqglass@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 11:28:06 -0700
Subject: L3 RFC draft help
Message-Id: <C8387637-A4D8-457A-A589-312CC2C1F33F@gmail.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (18C66)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/wOQQKmh2A2UtQnwAtn5f-YCHNJw>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 18:29:58 -0000

Hey.  It occurs to me that while all this net neutrality talk is going on, we should reconcile our inability to discern optional identities at the protocol level, and so it is suggestible that IP routers engage at their routable layers this film to provide for a modular open protocol for soft humans to be, well.  Human.  In their chosen soft styled internet, where presentation and deft thought towards thought markings are known to be. And identities route traffic, through towards the expected.

Think back towards your 1970s selves, where your modem is light on bits, but well your content is heavy on thought, deliverable and digestable.  Further this with a sharing of known pathways in around which path choices are then, perhaps prefixed with community identities which allow for the (other) groupings to wit and match at thread speed and without the uneeded.

Who here wrote their last RFC draft?  and I am interested in the language parser, if somebody wants to give it a whirl and produce with us the first Ethics license, subbed from (any number of licenses) and with a clause of protocol participation.

And as expected, your request for comments?

#aQ



Sent from my iPhone