Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08.txt> (Internet Protocol, Version 6 (IPv6) Specification) to Internet Standard

Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com> Sat, 11 February 2017 06:15 UTC

Return-Path: <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98CAD12956F for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 22:15:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vDAIyVCy68rI for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 22:15:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ua0-x229.google.com (mail-ua0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c08::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F46912944C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 22:15:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ua0-x229.google.com with SMTP id i68so42432177uad.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 22:15:31 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=VLUR+Dorq2xCsVfPXBm9o8n0fx90bak6ixm7ooVmXko=; b=JHIhAcEahrKvNsU7YBqRWiIvDkdfXHv18/d4yXIOUgGImILsehHBcJvrZ2pSqgYUrA xNhvquyv2vghWXyUdMXMvb/GFa6TyvrRnMrMvi3KZPKFoDVLJBDmSGPhwg/UaQACqGOu 8/Agh2FHQF4+1KYxFHTC7ULQ+lhqwskhl1zCuw7FuH3Yvfsmqh5k4SnZMGWVV3+UvCZB 7TSk4V/7ZQIOaDZqDAViOltdkNidBbbbybKureu5tpwe4cCCk2bdPB6/QDRALWR3eHvn qttWeT0T40tTr/Pt5ETjEt3DX8H9TSmlkkFy4Fkv/Ap3r28uUdElq7x6iTBvCGXGsSkt FemA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=VLUR+Dorq2xCsVfPXBm9o8n0fx90bak6ixm7ooVmXko=; b=PgD5O4EyLUzKW/hMWsUlOn/NNyXb/b/3bpUM7dFUiwJ1Yy1vxz3wI0Y/zcobubRkPm XuA9vIHjrPVvJQE8V5W1bx3fTpfAdS9XL5cy6yuDMJnDRLB19NVUDn8xF9rJ5oabCZ/1 kZIAaJoWhWa/01T9+SYMjfC3v+BI0Yo6iFYGGHfXkY9KRZLEE4G6WzUuSFnH0wC7T4TX ykRXq8hd0cCfkiTBQlf/UIN0AdBmUnFTXE+aVNkPRddCs+NGRDPXqj2mlVaYDGFgey+G hqf4A7ywECaiLwEBfvYEIrsb7Ym7Gmq+85yptBaeaGnFZcqiqlT80U7heG+xdEcALEYy cxlw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39noapgSyA6plfaKhfFaWLw4GB/oaR3x5Y4kFXDhmrxh+PVdUFvgzE9RJNQXRgywJpAgH1WwI26REFu6hg==
X-Received: by 10.176.85.24 with SMTP id t24mr6708094uaa.75.1486793730507; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 22:15:30 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.103.49.14 with HTTP; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 22:15:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.103.49.14 with HTTP; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 22:15:29 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <3a180e40-936b-956b-9fc3-5ecdd4d905ee@gmail.com>
References: <148599296506.18647.12389618334616420462.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <30725d25-9829-bf50-23c6-9e1b757e5cba@si6networks.com> <7ee506c2-4213-9396-186a-2b742c32f93b@gmail.com> <EA7E5B60-F136-47C6-949C-D123FB8DA70E@cisco.com> <00af01d27e11$fe539500$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <60F01869-8B32-46D3-80B1-A140DF1DDA8A@employees.org> <8D401C5B-C3C3-4378-9DFA-BF4ACC8E9DAF@qti.qualcomm.com> <D2D907D5-84B4-43BB-9103-F87DA9F122EB@employees.org> <33DC7B74-D240-4FF2-A8FF-C9C5A66809EE@qti.qualcomm.com> <1179DE45-3971-44A1-9630-28F76D2D652D@employees.org> <2ea64b3c-d69d-6b6c-cb04-fe63727a8bee@si6networks.com> <23C46409-337C-468D-BCDC-34027BB56CAD@employees.org> <30715b9e-e9b7-320e-f9e2-fc3f64615d5c@si6networks.com> <CAJE_bqcKu1XVQOPzcd+8b68WcQyjH9QmszaSvKWhT8SvHJ0ppg@mail.gmail.com> <m2y3xdpmjd.wl-randy@psg.com> <5333378B-0F8D-4966-82B2-DFF9639CEC7D@fugue.com> <3a180e40-936b-956b-9fc3-5ecdd4d905ee@gmail.com>
From: Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2017 01:15:29 -0500
Message-ID: <CA+MHpBoVEqvfcAXURj9FuqQR7JxWbbeL0P8r5E5dwcXOnB13wQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc2460bis-08.txt> (Internet Protocol, Version 6 (IPv6) Specification) to Internet Standard
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f403045dd960294b7c05483b2496
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/wQC-iKE-iRoH9qM2flNZNJeTarY>
Cc: IETF Discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2017 06:15:35 -0000

Hi Brian,

On Feb 10, 2017 8:32 PM, "Brian E Carpenter" <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
wrote:

On 11/02/2017 14:12, Ted Lemon wrote:
> On Feb 10, 2017, at 8:02 PM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
>> excuse?  this is why we have ietf last call.
>
> No, we do not have IETF last call so that people who participated in the
working group discussion can re-litigate the points they lost on in the
working group discussion.

I was fairly specific when I raised the issue at
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/myyPO9b4dYfYeGQrdPjTNzIHArY

>> I do not dispute that this sentence reached WG consensus. However, I want
>> to ask if it has IETF consensus.

If people who were not involved in the 6man debate have opinions, it would
be useful to hear from them. I agree that there is no point in the same
people repeating the same arguments.


Thanks for putting it so succinctly. Getting the input from the broader
community will be extremely helpful.

Regards
Suresh