Re: [IAOC] Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy

Marshall Eubanks <marshall.eubanks@gmail.com> Sun, 22 July 2012 19:37 UTC

Return-Path: <marshall.eubanks@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 138DA21F86A2 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Jul 2012 12:37:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GDDLqzqpc+iP for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Jul 2012 12:37:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-bk0-f44.google.com (mail-bk0-f44.google.com [209.85.214.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D91C21F86A4 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 22 Jul 2012 12:37:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by bkty7 with SMTP id y7so4326042bkt.31 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 22 Jul 2012 12:38:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=eZEmfVRo+Fq13jAe968ZwpWuA+P2loj5VEMd2+SqDUk=; b=def70tNilx4VLfQA9JPaD81qqGmMGkkD8+K4AK3tA/gBoIryBM2RTgBuXho4P34m5U 83JgZxWhmX5ncJ69/FATxGnYwW8+pdUNJhgi99kTZU1ITKsjFQvOkhiZdoX0kMumRUoP NSbE+w0WDyMc7+pkGEUR/lBhnns90PWL3jnujxi0EcnYwUvwKHKYw2cjHS79H1zq0Ahg 5FCuZvyZz8cVv7OAj4wquaaqh1F6XKSk/r8+g1zPqsw8ATOpp8YAy0z6xR76tATKu55Z pgPazUyUZS4ONTz8ReirrfILdW/jiLcRXXCV2E+tZV4kEc2t3+PD7c30x95k1fFQAZ+o RaBg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.151.81 with SMTP id b17mr6489903bkw.95.1342985883780; Sun, 22 Jul 2012 12:38:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.205.82.79 with HTTP; Sun, 22 Jul 2012 12:38:03 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20120722153118.60473.qmail@joyce.lan>
References: <CAJNg7VKqbdXeFXCe6iBRPe=X89q4NuSVcgvmc+C=t0826HRwiA@mail.gmail.com> <20120722153118.60473.qmail@joyce.lan>
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2012 15:38:03 -0400
Message-ID: <CAJNg7VK9OJNdtBb4+F3ZepvgpwuXQ_30ung_Y91m--g1a+CpfA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [IAOC] Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy
From: Marshall Eubanks <marshall.eubanks@gmail.com>
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2012 19:37:03 -0000

On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 11:31 AM, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:
>> Yes, we typically then point out that much of what they want is
>> available on line, and frequently negotiate with opposing counsel to
>> moderate demands for depositions, etc., but, in the end, we propose,
>> the judge and opposing counsel dispose. That won't change.
>
> I'd want to set the depo rate high enough that if someone has to be
> deposed, he or she will at least feel that the money makes up for
> the hassle.
>
> For people with unique skills or knowledge, $800/hr is not unusual.
> So long as the rate is published ahead of time, you're not going to
> get much argument.  ("Yes, we know it's high.  But we've already told
> you how to download stuff yourself for free.")
>

Please  note : out of pocket expenses (if someone has to travel to a
hearing, say) would be reimbursed, but
IETF volunteers will not be paid from these fees.

Regards
Marshall


> R's,
> John