Re: IETF 62
jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca> Mon, 20 September 2004 16:47 UTC
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA19531; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 12:47:41 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C9RQW-0001uh-Nf; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 12:54:09 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1C9R9s-00035I-0Q; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 12:36:56 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1C9R30-0000Jc-0i for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 12:29:50 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA18075 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 12:29:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mx01.cybersurf.com ([209.197.145.104]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C9R90-0001Us-AE for ietf@ietf.org; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 12:36:14 -0400
Received: from mail.cyberus.ca ([209.197.145.21]) by mx01.cybersurf.com with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1C9R2E-0005Xo-DA for ietf@ietf.org; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 12:29:02 -0400
Received: from [216.209.86.2] (helo=[10.0.0.9]) by mail.cyberus.ca with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1C9R2C-0002aD-8q; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 12:29:00 -0400
From: jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca>
To: Ben Crosby <ben.crosby@alcatel.com>
In-Reply-To: <19C06709BE3DD54FAC8ADFBBF31C7FF7176676@usdals324.usa.alcatel.com>
References: <19C06709BE3DD54FAC8ADFBBF31C7FF7176676@usdals324.usa.alcatel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Organization: jamalopolous
Message-Id: <1095697736.1075.69.camel@jzny.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 12:28:57 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 82c9bddb247d9ba4471160a9a865a5f3
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: IETF 62
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: hadi@cyberus.ca
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 02ec665d00de228c50c93ed6b5e4fc1a
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On Mon, 2004-09-20 at 11:38, Ben Crosby wrote: > Jamal, > > I fly into and out of Ottawa on average once a week - living there. > It is bloody awkward to travel from there, and very few locations are > direct flights. Theres direct flights to and from toronto every hour. Not to mention Montreal and Vancouver. You can get from almost anywhere in the world in one hop to those 3. Theres direct flights to some of the major carrier hubs like Chicago, Detroit, New york, Pitsburgh daily. Ok, we only have one direct flight to Europe - Heathrow - which is also could be considered to have direct flights to almost anywhere else in Europe or other parts of the world. But you dont need to take that flight - you can go to the other hubs. And we have a brand new airport - someones gotta make use of it ;-> I dont think getting here is awakward at all. > Not to mention that crossing the border normally adds a couple > of hundred dollars to the ticket price. That applies going eitehr direction. > Getting to MN was two flights and one connection, the same as everywhere > in the US for me. > Two hops as well to Ottawa. > I personally would avoid connecting through Chicago every time if I could. > Almost always guaranteed to miss connections, be delayed, or lose luggage. So i see your problem is Chicago. I hate that airport as well. It has to be the worst airport on earth at the moment. Chicagos misery shouldnt map to Ottawa though. > Alcatel does have a large presence in Ottawa, and that was one of the original > reasons why we suggested it as a venue. It turns out that the only facility > large enough to host a meeting here is the Ottawa Congress Center, which was > unavailable for the meeting we wished to host. This i would agree with. > We explored Vancouver and Montreal as other alternatives. Neither had > availability at a venue large enough for the meeting. Probably a little further planning would have helped. When Nortel organized the IETF they did it in Washington for political reasons as i understood it back then. cheers, jamal _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
- Re: IETF 62 Ben Crosby
- Re: IETF 62 Greg Daley
- Re: IETF 62 Martin Stiemerling
- Re: IETF 62 Ben Crosby
- Re: IETF 62 jamal
- Re: IETF 62 Melinda Shore
- Re: IETF 62 shogunx
- Re: IETF 62 jamal
- Re: IETF 62 Ben Crosby
- Re: IETF 62 Tim Chown
- Re: IETF 62 Ben Crosby
- Re: IETF 62 jamal
- Re: IETF 62 Ben Crosby
- Re: IETF 62 Michael Richardson