Re: [79all] IETF Badge

Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com> Mon, 15 November 2010 04:21 UTC

Return-Path: <ole@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC2693A693A for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Nov 2010 20:21:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.563
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.563 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.036, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ch2g6fdgV2lV for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Nov 2010 20:20:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sj-iport-4.cisco.com (sj-iport-4.cisco.com [171.68.10.86]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 263463A6B6F for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Nov 2010 20:20:54 -0800 (PST)
Authentication-Results: sj-iport-4.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAHNE4EyrR7H+/2dsb2JhbACiUHGgf4I+DQGXR4MLgj8EhFqBKoQISw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.59,198,1288569600"; d="scan'208";a="217411201"
Received: from sj-core-2.cisco.com ([171.71.177.254]) by sj-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 15 Nov 2010 04:21:34 +0000
Received: from pita.cisco.com (pita.cisco.com [171.71.177.199]) by sj-core-2.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oAF4LYFI018386; Mon, 15 Nov 2010 04:21:34 GMT
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 20:21:00 -0800 (PST)
From: Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com>
To: Lawrence Conroy <lconroy@insensate.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [79all] IETF Badge
In-Reply-To: <FB3C8C9D-540C-4043-9257-21359BFBD8F6@insensate.co.uk>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.63.1011142014550.26983@pita.cisco.com>
References: <1106719229.799545.1289526328086.JavaMail.root@sz0152a.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net> <Pine.GSO.4.63.1011112007060.12026@pita.cisco.com> <201011122308.oACN89K1013100@sj-core-1.cisco.com> <Pine.GSO.4.63.1011121616000.12606@pita.cisco.com> <FB3C8C9D-540C-4043-9257-21359BFBD8F6@insensate.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com>
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 04:21:08 -0000

Lawrence,

"Free lunch" is sort of a term of art.

I was referring to access to the meeting. So far, it's mostly been 
based on the honor system, but is seems pretty clear to me that the
"one badge, one person" principle should apply. Buying one 
registration and passing it around to a bunch of people would not
seem to be in line with how we operate, and no, we probably don't have 
that all clearly written down.

Ole

Ole J. Jacobsen
Editor and Publisher,  The Internet Protocol Journal
Cisco Systems
Tel: +1 408-527-8972   Mobile: +1 415-370-4628
E-mail: ole@cisco.com  URL: http://www.cisco.com/ipj


On Mon, 15 Nov 2010, Lawrence Conroy wrote:

> Hi Ole, folks,
>  I missed it -- the IETF fee includes lunch now?
> The IETF meetings have often had badge police on the food.
> So .. were you referring to that, or anyone being allowed into the meetings?
> [Requirement to fill in Blue sheets is an entirely different topic to barring entry]
> 
> all the best,
>   Lawrence
>