IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IAOC requesting input on (potential) meeting cities

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Wed, 12 April 2017 13:26 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95E1C129AFA for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 06:26:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AXHUuKFMBiQj for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 06:26:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-x22f.google.com (mail-qt0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3ABF129B1E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 06:26:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id n46so21761570qta.2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 06:26:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=+aJSXLepHRGtuC8Vvp1tb8sNERJWnmAtfA0FIPfFe9o=; b=G+TkwYJ00FTNUkAGSSMda/cV/tKJmPJxZgQRzxNbiF9uZ53iuFymIV+U8+mqoTZf1G GZmMI8CRsGSSrIowXxuBnYDYUOtJM8u9fDjAKOPuL6QCOG1ct0XMg7yNDeYCWv6C4nYp AuBdViXrb+IUVIlHl3W6aftCIQ3D5GS+28fQY4T9vsjzwFoWkWacRCkUdKJvcKNVHNBa IlJctrgO7D1KnS9GvTRub8Ir8FRQkVixSzH+0sDU23MZ+cO4KFK/GGye/B1teCc6N5mo pcdt5NF5P31rn7mt/e5iEaun3TEljtQY0/RsBL2EJpR3j3T9hOeicSEFupxKlkQ/uWG9 gEXA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=+aJSXLepHRGtuC8Vvp1tb8sNERJWnmAtfA0FIPfFe9o=; b=hoF8JWGh+/ao3qLkdyJnmTJt7cpEO6AoV8AAjLlU4Gr89t/FESPbrAe5RfTdStru92 yTXjgtjoEupgZa/MXKwg6it1MvenckGaVX2fflfzcqgL6yk/pthjjFZIgMYal7P8bdDR +Jfr6f0azWUG60rb/wc7COOqAcgaUH2vqbJ0EBnpZ+UFcK+eMnufn8zXVvPygwTlaw20 JRoZZq6DbVxvlu1fvx/dQ3hsGtUwLdd3RYzb7U+TMTU2GHcNmCfY9TcJFp66aUsLCfOt UngqQ+aXoA0flPq5QFvlaTpTN43c8+5A2H0Y4ZUp3gt81lYnEmGJMrLu3c7Wb0Fz1aXN 6I0Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/7Vxr9Bogy8kD060QrnlTzpMHBK52x20g3Vc8Bz2qbrB9dXrX9O9SrlWZ2JxJrL5A==
X-Received: by 10.200.56.76 with SMTP id r12mr14099343qtb.138.1492003577087; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 06:26:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.30.228] (c-73-167-64-188.hsd1.nh.comcast.net. [73.167.64.188]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 19sm13401873qtv.38.2017.04.12.06.26.15 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 12 Apr 2017 06:26:16 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <AD2AF7CA-ACAB-4642-BA6A-FB77423CD74F@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_E49CB26A-FAF7-4DB9-87AE-E65855B2474A"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Subject: Re: IAOC requesting input on (potential) meeting cities
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 09:26:14 -0400
In-Reply-To: <697AB8AC-BD17-47D6-94C7-B80186500699@consulintel.es>
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>, iaoc@ietf.org
To: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
References: <E67FDB14-9895-48E0-A334-167172D322DB@nohats.ca> <20170403152624.GA11714@gsp.org> <93404c29-78ba-ff9b-9170-f5f2a5389a31@gmail.com> <E068F01A-B720-4E7A-A60F-AA5BDA22D535@consulintel.es> <20170404181505.GA4004@localhost> <CAAQiQRcvu-BfBA_NEqZwXsHEn6ujpa2=w7P5Vu2f6GLXjKqkcA@mail.gmail.com> <20170404202446.GB4004@localhost> <2987213d-075e-beff-64f8-d316709c404a@cs.tcd.ie> <20170404204617.GC16732@puck.nether.net> <3D4D193E-0D41-44DD-BB0C-E7741A7A2260@gmail.com> <20170404221042.GC4004@localhost> <7E834C8D-FCFB-48C4-925A-73B5FDEC60FD@consulintel.es> <102DED0B-F1CD-4C65-8AA2-5270227EECCC@consulintel.es> <697AB8AC-BD17-47D6-94C7-B80186500699@consulintel.es>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/wfwH70S3zjvzCZesUL_5V9-mFiU>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 13:26:21 -0000

On Apr 12, 2017, at 4:53 AM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es> wrote:
> Do we need to ask again and again every day?

Has the IAOC met since the first time you asked?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email