IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board

"Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com> Fri, 20 February 2009 04:55 UTC

Return-Path: <pbaker@verisign.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3412E3A698B for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Feb 2009 20:55:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.884
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.884 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.682, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OKiNWeaE7qC7 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Feb 2009 20:55:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from colibri.verisign.com (colibri.verisign.com [65.205.251.74]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DB5B3A677C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Feb 2009 20:55:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mou1wnexcn01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (mailer1.verisign.com [65.205.251.34]) by colibri.verisign.com (8.13.6/8.13.4) with ESMTP id n1K4V8ZX011220; Thu, 19 Feb 2009 20:31:09 -0800
Received: from MOU1WNEXMB09.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([10.25.15.197]) by mou1wnexcn01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 19 Feb 2009 20:55:15 -0800
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Subject: RE: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 20:54:05 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C99317.6B9568C4"
Message-ID: <2788466ED3E31C418E9ACC5C3166155768B2B1@mou1wnexmb09.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board
Thread-Index: AcmSPta50gHpQZvXSO+87MdQnXpLWAAF50JgADAzkOQ=
References: <20090217234217.D9FB66BE56A@mercury.lcs.mit.edu><20090217191240.029b7d57@cs.columbia.edu><C12A100E0BB445E5B8C144839AE93A42@LROSENTOSHIBA><20090218022441.GA3600@mini-me.lan> <8EFB68EAE061884A8517F2A755E8B60A19DAFCA52D@NA-EXMSG-W601.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
From: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>
To: Christian Huitema <huitema@windows.microsoft.com>, Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>, Lawrence Rosen <lrosen@rosenlaw.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Feb 2009 04:55:15.0837 (UTC) FILETIME=[6BC4F2D0:01C99317]
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 04:55:03 -0000

I already tried weaving that particular bright shiny object. plus the suggestion that we move from a three stage standards process to two. And it did not work.
 
Quick someone mention nazis.

________________________________

From: ietf-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of Christian Huitema
Sent: Thu 2/19/2009 12:54 AM
To: Theodore Tso; Lawrence Rosen
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: RE: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board



This discussion of IPR seems to be running in circle. Can't we switch to something else, e.g. whether RFC could be written in some other format than ASCII text?

-- Christian Huitema



_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.39.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status