Gen-ART LC Review of draft-freed-sieve-date-index-11

Ben Campbell <> Fri, 23 May 2008 18:47 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from [] (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BA0028C2EF; Fri, 23 May 2008 11:47:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F91D3A6CD3; Fri, 23 May 2008 11:47:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Fd14ourqC3Ao; Fri, 23 May 2008 11:47:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:266::2]) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD20C3A6CE5; Fri, 23 May 2008 11:47:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [] ( []) (authenticated bits=0) by (8.14.2/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m4NIllBx060682 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 23 May 2008 13:47:48 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from
Message-Id: <>
From: Ben Campbell <>
To: General Area Review Team <>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v919.2)
Subject: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-freed-sieve-date-index-11
Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 13:47:42 -0500
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.919.2)
Cc:,, Lisa Dusseault <>,,
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Discussion <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.

Document: draft-freed-sieve-date-index-11
Reviewer: Ben Campbell
Review Date:  2008-05-23
IETF LC End Date: 2008-05-28
IESG Telechat date: (if known)


This document is basically ready for publication as a draft standard.  
I have a few minor comments which I consider optional to address.


Section 4:

Does it make sense to add a reference for ":is" and "i;ascii-casemap"?

Can you mention the reason that the date test can only apply to one  
header field at a time?

Last paragraph, last sentence: "... the last one that appears should  
be used."

Is that a normative SHOULD?

Section 4.1, time-zone syntax:

I assume the 4 digits are hhmm, as mentioned later in the discussion  
of default time zone. It might help to explicitly state that in this  

Section 6.1, section title:

Section title is "Examples", but I only see one example :-)



IETF mailing list