Re: Oauth blog post
Glen Zorn <glenzorn@gmail.com> Sun, 29 July 2012 21:35 UTC
Return-Path: <glenzorn@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9998621F8630 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 29 Jul 2012 14:35:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q21n2as-Wty6 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 29 Jul 2012 14:35:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pb0-f44.google.com (mail-pb0-f44.google.com [209.85.160.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1513521F8628 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 29 Jul 2012 14:35:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pbcwy7 with SMTP id wy7so8638659pbc.31 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 29 Jul 2012 14:35:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:organization :date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer; bh=zF9Gqm0xU2PknZf3U5+RcKHy9eOiR0ABhNoVzPMnDEk=; b=TT6zgdb6blKiA0q0GjNSh8IA181LdbZi1V0/QNPk5xJgKR6ZYZ2tKbFBtvdPzrg2VS dnJq+efuKoPIdeiggxZ35toVszFvNeD2IcTs5MN2p8Fnju9nIgRHv9wd3EseDn0Euwmv NEXI/3TMiI7sxLTrs9+/UysMo+KeUDqAL6nA6Yb8K2fwA3WczzWk9QyiJ/b978zrc1rd +kc5ARl5B4+s8sipTBqSyA+N7DSkT8V5x5y8DJEYLcibQcQbeXGTfLuEoF0tc5JqpYwY dhA5+R0q0J7JLrwgylJJdJZ++jYI3Xa0J2lzTGjdI5WO3bYP3FPQbh/FCiipQHQSIsor gp8g==
Received: by 10.66.77.169 with SMTP id t9mr20243984paw.70.1343597744787; Sun, 29 Jul 2012 14:35:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.195] (216-19-185-109.dyn.novuscom.net. [216.19.185.109]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id wi6sm6462368pbc.35.2012.07.29.14.35.43 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 29 Jul 2012 14:35:44 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: Oauth blog post
From: Glen Zorn <glenzorn@gmail.com>
To: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
In-Reply-To: <6EC0C8C6-3071-4DFD-8F4C-779A08D94D1E@gmx.net>
References: <501531F7.5040404@gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20120729073422.06d8fe10@resistor.net> <39B73AD9-4E8F-4E94-A538-69BE5D8C0E18@gmx.net> <1343593068.9245.0.camel@gwz-laptop> <6EC0C8C6-3071-4DFD-8F4C-779A08D94D1E@gmx.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=-4jFmvEm72hoO7XV1LCdj"
Organization: Network Zen
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 14:02:20 -0700
Message-ID: <1343595740.6354.10.camel@gwz-laptop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 (2.32.3-1.fc14)
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 21:35:45 -0000
On Sun, 2012-07-29 at 13:28 -0700, Hannes Tschofenig wrote: > > > > Do you think that corporate domination of "open" standards development is OK? > > > > The barrier for participation is low since there are no membership fees, etc. For participation, yes, all that is needed is an email account; if one wishes to attend meetings (just the main ones - let's ignore interims), the bar rises considerably. The chances of dominating a WG or attaining a leadership position in the IETF are very close to zero without meeting attendance. I spend about 10% of my gross income on travel, meeting fees, etc. for IETF meetings; I don't consider that to be trivial. > Nevertheless, those who participate in standardization efforts have to spend their time. And somebody's money: I spend about 10% of my gross income on travel, meeting fees, etc. for IETF meetings; I don't consider that to be trivial. > So, typically those who participate for a longer period of time need to have some incentives. These incentives often come from working for a specific company. > > We cannot force anyone to participate in any of our working groups. In the OAuth case we have lots of other people participating but they typically ask questions and provide implementation feedback rather than trying to steer the standardization work. > > Ciao > Hannes > > PS: Eran was also working for a big corporation, namely Yahoo. I could imagine that Yahoo also had some incentives to pay Eran for his participation in this work.
- Oauth blog post Yaron Sheffer
- Re: Oauth blog post Randy Bush
- Re: Oauth blog post SM
- RE: Oauth blog post Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
- Re: Oauth blog post Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: Oauth blog post Glen Zorn
- RE: Oauth blog post Worley, Dale R (Dale)
- Re: Oauth blog post Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: Oauth blog post Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: Oauth blog post Yoav Nir
- Re: Oauth blog post Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: Oauth blog post Glen Zorn
- RE: Oauth blog post Worley, Dale R (Dale)
- Re: Oauth blog post Glen Zorn
- Re: Oauth blog post Yaron Sheffer
- Re: Oauth blog post Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: Oauth blog post Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: Oauth blog post Tim Bray
- RE: Oauth blog post Worley, Dale R (Dale)
- Re: Oauth blog post SM
- Re: Oauth blog post Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: Oauth blog post Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: Oauth blog post SM
- RE: Oauth blog post Worley, Dale R (Dale)
- RE: Oauth blog post Glen Zorn
- Re: Oauth blog post Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: Oauth blog post Hannes Tschofenig
- RE: Oauth blog post Worley, Dale R (Dale)
- Re: Oauth blog post Hector Santos