Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?
David Farmer <farmer@umn.edu> Mon, 30 January 2017 14:32 UTC
Return-Path: <farmer@umn.edu>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95AD912998D for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 06:32:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.498
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.498 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=umn.edu
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jh-_zWT5hqvc for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 06:32:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mta-p7.oit.umn.edu (mta-p7.oit.umn.edu [134.84.196.207]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42DB812997C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 06:32:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mta-p7.oit.umn.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74C2321F for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 14:32:11 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at umn.edu
Received: from mta-p7.oit.umn.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mta-p7.oit.umn.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BddOIYlJLroD for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 08:32:11 -0600 (CST)
Received: from mail-vk0-f72.google.com (mail-vk0-f72.google.com [209.85.213.72]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mta-p7.oit.umn.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44A7619C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 08:32:11 -0600 (CST)
Received: by mail-vk0-f72.google.com with SMTP id n125so118114626vke.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 06:32:11 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=umn.edu; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=/VUCwoPyqsc39CkYpuXyxmgsqAET30DiuRSKdGB7898=; b=M1Ym110e9RDloCCO6LZmmQg5bTZOSp1bXY5WnXk/JqoidPNmjrz0t5Xhry100TBUli AB8jh6yGW6CyjNUdHlpiZGNzRMPuq4NRhzxRrsqWBJ7IwEsmqvMfUboPOOFjfxalADhR BTnT+yGmlKXmXFC3jA9O32LMBSPTYYpP5/DEfqvd/BrOt69fDQUe3u/hvmgHgKUS5s5A 2RsaD21wm30dbaTHBf1VtrwZQle8wgJznRkmh0O2eYR6V27Mp9420zRDd7/UBGHFAmVB nUH6NdtdofNGC/OzEdYLGxJ9B+uT8tlehb4BkOmHTYzhGP2IXH4syov+RicBytE9nMzU etcQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=/VUCwoPyqsc39CkYpuXyxmgsqAET30DiuRSKdGB7898=; b=Mj0how/qbdHFpjndGZ8h1V6tqnxSQyd0FJQAbPAkoHxHukkH2tHo9XQQ3cDm+C77fy WIIqtLqCXzc1ZFKz/3iIiMFOFmx5fyFGfo2+I1y3FW6s6rd0J/Kaz5C4Zbqbi7NFkBcZ NLTtaarjlPxlC48beHc96aKjdWHhYXYOwYoF36a7KaBK2jslRo/WqBfHJ9wImmGWV27B VlGonIfbpMt2a5F9pGCNGz2R8DQ8q4U9bPuFbERSEonNOcCZL1LDV4AvdA5aYS5G6xQf MDck6UUNcNiK9xfM1uqkBIao5qQJHcTEtW80CxBS7H0tLzYk5dY9Rv5Fb8EfG/bSItFZ XfVw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXKqdU8SxNiRN4Ax+Ec7WQP9jBCj1Tmxt3Am6cctY+ZP6KAE3T4tCLUKVCD53+QTJG6iYf+qWvWBcanfXk76eoPlAaSAFhj6vHm9tCkpBEqsFsMqQi85cIo9qh9sPWZgIDTOViFYBWDlHSM=
X-Received: by 10.31.49.81 with SMTP id x78mr9481507vkx.82.1485786730648; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 06:32:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.31.49.81 with SMTP id x78mr9481494vkx.82.1485786730444; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 06:32:10 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.103.84.15 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 06:32:09 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <83add474-9949-2406-89d5-a753231166c9@gmail.com>
References: <CAAUuzMQwk5v+3HA+KFrsCZfbNSXFpgBE0XdKfJWHgDss9-VkTw@mail.gmail.com> <CAHw9_iJ78ECZ5x8LsR53KhRFnbhi3gV7n8yzG07e1wbN-SG14Q@mail.gmail.com> <8f5ef9ac-b62b-863a-0a0e-f5d2b329de09@nostrum.com> <20170129134410.GA14422@gsp.org> <4D233FE8-6E84-446F-A8ED-604E4F7EAB99@piuha.net> <0d60ed80-2183-e329-05ad-e0cd7ab77ac1@cs.tcd.ie> <ebc650e4-3e42-5472-5c5f-ac5c0e5fc09f@dcrocker.net> <83add474-9949-2406-89d5-a753231166c9@gmail.com>
From: David Farmer <farmer@umn.edu>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 08:32:09 -0600
Message-ID: <CAN-Dau15rKNPeYynoByE1Z7jFJLtN54TohZTVSroAhmB4GAnFw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?
To: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114388b047d763054750ae3d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/wxiL5MpT2mbG98FzJi89k4_8eqY>
Cc: IETF-Discussion Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 14:32:13 -0000
On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 9:37 PM, Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com> wrote: > On 1/29/17 4:39 PM, Dave Crocker wrote: > > The folk at the head of the current administration don't care about such > > statements. But perhaps others who can effect change might. > > Right, including our congressional representatives. There is > likely to be a legislative response to what the administration > is trying to do, and if industry bodies speak up that can > provide them additional support and cover, I think. > > I do think that issuing both IETF-only and joint statements > with other organizations would be a good thing. Don't forget the courts, while I doubt the IETF would have standing, or the finances, to actually be a litigant, but it could prepare few amicus briefs explaining the impact of this overreach on the IETF. They might even be useful in the court and legislative hearings that will undoubtedly occur. -- =============================================== David Farmer Email:farmer@umn.edu Networking & Telecommunication Services Office of Information Technology University of Minnesota 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815 <(612)%20626-0815> Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952 <(612)%20812-9952> ===============================================
- If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IE… Dave Burstein
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Warren Kumari
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Hosnieh Rafiee
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Melinda Shore
- Re: If [removed] are blocked by the [removed], sh… S Moonesamy
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Clint Chaplin
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Emily Shepherd
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Adam Roach
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Paul Wouters
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Melinda Shore
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Rich Kulawiec
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… nalini.elkins
- Re: If [removed] are blocked by the [removed], sh… S Moonesamy
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… John Leslie
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Jari Arkko
- Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.… Stephen Farrell
- Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.… Dave Crocker
- Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.… George Michaelson
- Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.… Melinda Shore
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Jeffrey Altman
- Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.… nalini.elkins
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Brian E Carpenter
- RE: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Roni Even
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Melinda Shore
- Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.… John C Klensin
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Randy Bush
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Naeem Khademi
- Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.… Naeem Khademi
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Leif Johansson
- Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.… Leif Johansson
- Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.… Stewart Bryant
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Dave Cridland
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Leif Johansson
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Christer Holmberg
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Niels ten Oever
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Rich Kulawiec
- Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.… David Farmer
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… nalini.elkins
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Walid AL-SAQAF
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Randy Bush
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Niels ten Oever
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Melinda Shore
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Michael StJohns
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Alia Atlas
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… John C Klensin
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Melinda Shore
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Christian de Larrinaga
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Saifi Khan
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Paul Wouters
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Rich Kulawiec
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Jari Arkko
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Jari Arkko
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Emily Shepherd
- Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.… Dan Harkins
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Emily Shepherd
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.… Randy Bush
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Alejandro Acosta
- Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.… Dan Harkins
- Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.… Randy Bush
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Arturo Servin
- Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.… Dan Harkins
- Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.… Matthew Kerwin
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Jari Arkko
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Naeem Khademi
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Jari Arkko
- Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.… S Moonesamy
- Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.… Stephen Farrell
- Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.… Tim Chown
- Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.… Jari Arkko
- Re: If categories of people are blocked by the U.… nalini.elkins
- Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should th… Bless, Roland (TM)