Re: IETF network incremental plan

David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org> Thu, 17 November 2016 01:34 UTC

Return-Path: <drc@virtualized.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A190412960D for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 17:34:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=virtualized-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4fMzl29fsjri for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 17:34:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf0-x232.google.com (mail-pf0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28E4B129627 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 17:34:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf0-x232.google.com with SMTP id i88so45667883pfk.2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 17:34:07 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=virtualized-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references :to; bh=2NUwuPVRDJ16KYoAc0q5jF2HfJEOviXWNML2KJ6DJR8=; b=zD3NiJQaeMqajJFB2yvEnXm4P1gDeOJ3RfKUn2sB5G3rrdn9vFpti0cQjqifNLH67D Cglh/j44ZZsuodyb988gxddZXxQjw/2xG7M5rgm0/yWSWoTNm7Cl98yxe1yseCsmZreu FaLKcEJVixczNKgtg3E5RubHTZ16R3TrQIVf6AnK+x1iOxy7TVvDFM20bSKNs/cE30cg E6aPSTzTnN8WeRu08bZIFPDMn9pcY8ordcNY1xiz/unXMpuPd0Ymh6mq9KMguzHs2E6n NlvbwOqaepXjSBQWV/Tm7ChE1WcLgfEZuBVT6oXQusJTc0ifVFiNZhVokJgqgY85xjNB yvCw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=2NUwuPVRDJ16KYoAc0q5jF2HfJEOviXWNML2KJ6DJR8=; b=W5C4JraXQ/TYRv9Nvyp4O1drjjiMtdb8tUBhyFQ4OoLUFbW6tptjgbuknKpG/BJLVD /7JC4s9OoJAWPzgrxqEv+FEnKNq6ueg9LbDlXoREzPTEd01q3P6JGTPsfsT1B/JqE0Qd Roedi40f+rvyVNVMziJfSDTlyfM5hS6LRn0XkxR9hQzBQwn+wozEuI8rSkOrjsbL7tIk pp6vZsIXMljaIHRyg9jygFYU1PYsImfDdnR+YSpqWKhR5FMorGsyVTl7n53JwL04OkkT cbfxajeYqv20SwLcfzNE0l89fwZjF0kLmqwKkL0TKyYiCBhUVl6GAyFJoWMY0ff9GbaZ DJgw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvdfotkL8/INmvN+Xel63mIg6VO7+LvtBpFV9mgjd1jhC7SiPIp002WNYYzeNuqxwQ==
X-Received: by 10.99.124.20 with SMTP id x20mr1503749pgc.60.1479346447039; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 17:34:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from t2001067c0370014488de1190d256957e.hotel-wired.v6.meeting.ietf.org ([2001:67c:370:144:88de:1190:d256:957e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c8sm677096pfe.15.2016.11.16.17.34.05 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 16 Nov 2016 17:34:06 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: IETF network incremental plan
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_B55395D8-C732-4515-B356-CA6CFE03BE22"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail
From: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
In-Reply-To: <dbcca137-9fef-723c-8fbd-edb12aff0b46@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 10:34:00 +0900
Message-Id: <04D0964A-B0E7-4F9C-A725-65D9429492E9@virtualized.org>
References: <0C5BCD32-2D2A-42B9-8DEA-A1E1A527A8BB@consulintel.es> <m2zikzq7tg.wl-randy@psg.com> <dbcca137-9fef-723c-8fbd-edb12aff0b46@gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/wyeUbr-x5yqu6LYI3EqD2VZXIEA>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 01:34:22 -0000

>>  o the primary goal of the meeting netowrk is for attendees to get work
>>    done
> Yes. And that's my primary goal everywhere. Which means dual stack. EOM.

I sort of like the idea of making the default IETF SSID IPv6 only, with other SSIDs that support v4/dual stack. It would probably be an eye opening experience for some.

Regards,
-drc
(speaking only for myself)