RE: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.

Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com> Wed, 19 February 2020 17:35 UTC

Return-Path: <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DCB01208E1 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 09:35:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=outlook.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9-1YGpiwdYi8 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 09:35:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from EUR04-VI1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-oln040092075044.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.92.75.44]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 919E61208CD for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 09:34:59 -0800 (PST)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=J7gmgCFOEochRyjf3cZmvk210sGiVcx/n+IuxGJ+9qYXVHk0mhSu/bJmNKKFFsUEb76Ng9GSBXPJ7IviOefls1U3pMwfwwN/+zr+zOf8wm+O1KG8bWYT/SDAhYcc/ytSpoiyaOH2ssnI/BiGgC/YMPgK3WYeEXX5tJXWfmyVySXgORg785MelVYg9WUkvwGkW+m17ywEOvMl893TgTUlMGmtcfKvSDXNGXUsPAJfDtmP2thEWa2ZsKlRTRohbYla6LeBmYO5FdYYJuMAMFNGp2e0Z98kGDgnh4kWEXHAb4Om2IPkPD2XmLkuac+or5Y/1KaafhN05p2v2Z8kp+FCEw==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=s3/Ua77YyPvuD1qPNr89Qsz7gEM6dr+GHVLqx+k70Jc=; b=MxZ4NFdBX1wu88DleS7TVK5WXOO1SrA6k2VoJWQD14C1+z9M8IYX4AjlbBKx8KjF7fzLyXaWB1c0PxEBc7FI2hb6jJ7jsG6GZeE7XNdQ/rIMxgTSD4LcPCfcUUNtlNqTqgu8w3V78M3cMMoLDTEZ3WQtHxO9P2EziNDAN3//e7QiyatdAljPF78tMq9vbxgQnYCZ23EqxkUNe8rHHojy61TmNZLpEaU16cHsiuASSRCUZYvJkVwm4jgZFOHwUNJ3jjt3W0eHpiQ4I8hmSmlqQJ4bczOJc1k5Ts33F7Qr3EQPA84xvT03IiReUICNTjGhRFk2WK5CKCL8n+7uEjfnuQ==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=none; dmarc=none; dkim=none; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=outlook.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=s3/Ua77YyPvuD1qPNr89Qsz7gEM6dr+GHVLqx+k70Jc=; b=uq03gF2p6idFJYvlzer/RcNqkJ2t7Cp+N8EBqnGOAOJghMwfI5lDfoTGJx6xpxrLLJ9ybfwby8qHM4zJ0Yhv/YyOyRyEoneXbW9Zuplb/Hs8T/0Iq6ldhyRtTx58pm47pJyQeYz14c3FIsJFo5tfO6w0GjGNIEFN+DxIeXyYMZwJ3LjVuP4J+ACD6KBu/W2pUKNBwMFEcoT7Bfawpp3PFJx4mdp6PSbjraWUus68JuWNyfyM5BU56b56ADoc6s07TwogdflISbcDjjpQoc3bKOVdtb/KJ+I/o3UUyGV9CkDR+dqRRu8JCbpedk1feZyPp953ktk9uCaf0aoIdkqq6w==
Received: from DB3EUR04FT017.eop-eur04.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.24.53) by DB3EUR04HT214.eop-eur04.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.25.173) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2750.18; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 17:34:57 +0000
Received: from PR3P194MB0843.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (10.152.24.60) by DB3EUR04FT017.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.25.24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2750.18 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 17:34:57 +0000
Received: from PR3P194MB0843.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::b428:e305:c763:c9a3]) by PR3P194MB0843.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::b428:e305:c763:c9a3%5]) with mapi id 15.20.2729.032; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 17:34:57 +0000
From: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com>
To: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
CC: IETF Rinse Repeat <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
Thread-Topic: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.
Thread-Index: AdXnL4CMqKHMj241QNOLcaD05q7rXAAFTlYAAAFd+RA=
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 17:34:57 +0000
Message-ID: <PR3P194MB08432397118C0AB443EC7611AE100@PR3P194MB0843.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
References: <PR3P194MB0843ACAE01F33CEC57266A1AAE100@PR3P194MB0843.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <CAL9jLab3GN5eEwbC1cHQkG9onUn5rry7OMykQ7MiRGo90TKizg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL9jLab3GN5eEwbC1cHQkG9onUn5rry7OMykQ7MiRGo90TKizg@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-incomingtopheadermarker: OriginalChecksum:33241251F9ADB2D8E42AC97EF29EFC260D23C4C276D0DE8BCACEC436B6675488; UpperCasedChecksum:DED285B6DE1B56DEF1AC54ABEFFB572FB740FF15EDE84321BE33D5AAB5CCD4FA; SizeAsReceived:6963; Count:45
x-tmn: [sxvZkP8Psge77vK+mrc1/yQvbgV1Kpw/]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-incomingheadercount: 45
x-eopattributedmessage: 0
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 3811dd23-f702-45d7-2251-08d7b56209c7
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DB3EUR04HT214:
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: CZZwCfA8uPoYGsRaUq/ODLrn1J6JDsaOPUpw94p9xYjLsIJ3g2fbv5CcbmDzYefJMr8TD9CEdWY6/3D9Pf4+2mHkh83nGnRf0j1bVKdgh8Db6OD70W9iae7HgZGFnnV3+nTrilSNxExTVNGXLrUlct2TvolTLaeEYH5Z4w4zMNJ71KlXj6CrGN+nhvqZKJsYEpzXzt+Z6OKheUuAKVqgvkIXVeF31bMKDothcW6cvIc=
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: hmZ9DtHF72AN57wGXPHs5bXBC202rymdpLHyKh4x9o1Heo9Pqu24VLq3PxfZDhX/iA/2yH2nFZcoQeCFbEe6xKOdOSGv/WtO4y+s3mJie8RjgoQTHFU7MQk50h1hLbgf1+RW7YW/OgsLkbSPYA1jTA==
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-RMS-PersistedConsumerOrg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 3811dd23-f702-45d7-2251-08d7b56209c7
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-rms-persistedconsumerorg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 19 Feb 2020 17:34:57.0895 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DB3EUR04HT214
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/x-NU1CNN9yzpqq8CifaJtHIuRZE>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 17:35:02 -0000

>> these numbers are ~2yrs old... but 25% is not "almost nobody".

Actually, devilations in percentages makes things worse, some think it is 25% others think it is 30% others think no IPv6 at all :) and all these percentages are incorrect because only one thing can make it clear, to find an official solution announced for everybody stating that what should we do in such situation.

Best Regards,

Khaled Omar

-----Original Message-----
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com> 
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2020 6:51 PM
To: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com>
Cc: IETF Rinse Repeat <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: ipv4 and ipv6 Coexistence.

On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 9:28 AM Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com> wrote:

>
> From what I see in the real world, IPv4 still dominating and almost nobody started using IPv6, and also, I didn’t find any solution applied practically in today’s networks for this issue.
>

I don't think it's accurate to say: "almost nobody started using ipv6"

https://www.internetsociety.org/resources/2018/state-of-ipv6-deployment-2018/

these numbers are ~2yrs old... but 25% is not "almost nobody".